Politics Gun laws and news around the world

Yes and FIB could get a warrant to demand that the owner open the phone - except of course that they were dead. So instead they relied on an ancient piece of legislation that had never been used in such a way before. It is no wonder that Apple refused - with support from pretty much every civil rights and tech group.
 
With Gun Control Talk Rife, NICS Background Checks Jump 15% in August
With plenty of talk of confiscations and outlawing America’s most popular firearm — as night follows day — gun buyers are reaching into their wallets and…buying more guns. The National Shooting Sports Foundation’s just-released NICS data — a good barometer of firearm sales numbers — showed a sharp increase form July and year earlier numbers.
As the NSSF’s data show, August gun sales always begin to rise in August (July is the lowest NICS total month) most likely because we’re beginning to near fall and hunting season. But 2019’s August NICS check numbers took a sharp 15.2% jump over the year-earlier total.
The August 2019 NSSF-adjusted National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) figure of 1,113,535 is an increase of 15.2 percent compared to the August 2018 NSSF-adjusted NICS figure of 966,809. For comparison, the unadjusted August 2019 FBI NICS figure 2,341,363 reflects a 15.5 percent increase from the unadjusted FBI NICS figure of 2,026,309 in August 2018.

I still find it ironic how Democrats are doing more to help the so called Gun Lobby than Republicans.

Also:

Moms Demand Action Fails to Get Enough Signatures to Block Oklahoma’s Constitutional Carry Law
Long frustrated by their inability to get much action in Washington, D.C., Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America branched out to the states in an effort to score. A win, that is. Unfortunately for the Demanding Moms, they will remain frustrated in Oklahoma as they have failed to gather enough signatures to put Oklahoma’s new Constitutional Carry law up for a vote.
They needed 60,000 John or Jane Hancocks. But the Moms, led by a Democrat Oklahoma State Rep. named Jason Lowe (couldn’t they find an actual mom to lead them?), failed miserably.
 
Leftists Said Maine's Permitless Carry Law Would Cause Chaos. Now It's the Safest State in US
One of the most promising examples of this is the situation in Maine, which was recently named the safest state in the union by U.S. News and World Report.


This comes nearly a full four years after Maine enacted a “Constitutional Carry” law, which allowed residents to carry a concealed firearm without the need for a special permit. It sounds scary, doesn’t it?

Of course not, but that didn’t stop the left from freaking out about it.


According to a blog post on the American Thinker, one opponent of the bill in the state legislature said it would give citizens a reason to be afraid every time they went out in public. It’s unclear how he came to this conclusion.
 
Two shot dead on London's streets amid warnings 'fluid supply' of guns is increasingly difficult to control
The violence came as police warned that the “fluid supply” of guns was becoming increasingly difficult to control, with gangs using new and innovative ways of smuggling them past border defences.

Simon Brough, head of firearms at the National Crime Agency (NCA), also warned that the “sheer volume” of firearms coming into the UK represented a “pernicious threat” that urgently needed to be addressed.

“The scale is really challenging, he told the Telegraph. “We are doing everything we can but criminals are operating in a lucrative business where they can be increasingly innovative and operate in a highly effective way.”

Last week, an Irish man found with 60 firearms in his car in Dover, en route from Calais, admitted gun smuggling.

Robert Keogh, 37, was stopped on August 2 by Border Force officers who found the weapons concealed deep inside the vehicle’s bumper and both rear quarter panels.

The number of shootings has been on the rise since 2013 and has in part being linked to the 2,000 drug supply chains identified as part of the country lines network.

Mr Brough said hand guns were being smuggled through eastern Europe, across nexus points in Belgium and the Netherlands and then onwards into the UK.

“Some of the methods criminal groups are using are incredibly sophisticated, for example, they are built into the interior of vehicles,” he said.
“The challenge at the border is the sheer volume of the operation.

“When a gun is coming in as a fast parcel, how can we find that? It’s a needle in a haystack.”

Shotguns lawfully held are being diverted into the criminal market via burglaries while other weapons are purchased blank and then converted.
Mr Brough said there was a trend towards “new and clean” guns being used for the first time that did not link to previous crimes.

“The source of them and availability leads to incidents such as we’ve seen this weekend,” he added.

Once again, the black market provideth.
 
Update regarding the Odessa mass shooting.

 
“No. I don't see the law enforcement going door to door. I see Americans complying with the law." @BetoORourke does not envision his mandatory gun buyback plan including door-to-door police visits.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

So he is demanding that all Americans turn over their semi-autos but is too much of a coward to start ordering confiscations.

NRA Sues San Francisco Over “Domestic Terror Group” Designation
Last week San Francisco supervisors voted unanimously to declare the NRA a “domestic terrorist organization”. Monday evening, the NRA responded with a lawsuit in federal court arguing the group’s 1st and 14th Amendment rights are being violated by the city council’s actions.


According to the lawsuit, the NRA wants a federal judge to block the city from moving forward with the resolution, which has yet to be signed by Mayor London Breed. The organization is asking that the judge issue an order:

“to immediately cease and refrain from engaging in any conduct or activity which has the purpose or effect of interfering with the NRA’s exercise of the rights afforded to it under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; (2) to immediately cease and refrain from engaging in any conduct or activity which has the purpose or effect of interfering with, terminating, or diminishing any of the NRA’s memberships, sponsorships, contracts and/or business relationships with any persons, business or organizations; and (3) to immediately cease and refrain from any enforcement of, or from taking any official action pursuant to, the Resolution”
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

So he is demanding that all Americans turn over their semi-autos but is too much of a coward to start ordering confiscations.

NRA Sues San Francisco Over “Domestic Terror Group” Designation


Not a coward.

An empty electoral promise that he knows cannot possibly be kept. That's basic pandering.
 
How would an old gun with worn out serial numbers and manufacturer be registered?
 
20190911_172745.webp


Well I'm already to attend a confiscation............ I mean collection event.
 
Yup, but i will comply with the law while making my feelings known.
 
To pull apart a hunting rifle its undo a couple of boring screws. Action predictably fits into stock. That rifle its lever the trigger guard forward and it all pops open like a magic show. True ingenuity to think of all that and get it to neatly work together.
 
Polls Show Gun Control Support Trending Down
Polls from Quinnipiac University and an ABC News/Washington Postpartnership asked about the gun control debate in America and specific gun control proposals. Both polls showed a general downward trend in support for new gun control measures even in the immediate aftermath of mass shootings in Texas and Ohio.

Neither poll found heightened enthusiasm for any gun control proposal which had been polled more than twice. Instead, they found support for gun control policies either relatively stable or declining, though still substantial.

The September 5 ABC/Washington Post poll found support for "a nationwide ban on the sale" of undefined "assault weapons" fell 6 points from last April. It now sits at 56 percent support, up 9 points from its low in 2015 but a full 24 points down from its high point in 1994, when the federal assault weapons ban went into effect. The August 29 Quinnipiac University poll had similar results on an identically worded question with support dropping 3 points to 60 percent since May 22, 2019, and down 7 points from its highest level on February 20, 2018.

The retreat from high-water marks following the February 2018 Parkland shooting was evident in nearly all of the questions. The Quinnipiac poll found general support for "stricter gun laws" fell 6 points to 60 percent since last February. It also found a 3 point drop in the percentage of people who say "Congress needs to do more to reduce gun violence" from 75 percent last February to 72 percent this September, and a 4 point drop in support for universal background checks over that time.

Despite this slight downward trend, expanding background checks still enjoys 93 percent support in the latest poll. That support has remained relatively consistent, with the Quinnipiac poll finding the same level of support in June 2016 as in August 2019 and the ABC/Washington Post poll finding the same level of support in May 1999 as in September 2019.
However, while expanding background checks to cover intrastate used gun sales between private individuals has enjoyed consistently high support in polling, it has been far less popular when proposed as ballot initiatives.
Both Nevada and Maine voted on universal background check initiatives in 2016. While Quinnipiac polls put support for the policy at 93 percent in June 2016, neither initiative came anywhere close to that level of support. Nevada's initiative passed with only 50.45 percent support—a victory of 0.9 percent. Maine's universal background check initiative failed, with 51.8 percent voting against it.
 
32% of Dems Support ‘Terrorist’ Label for NRA, 28% Believe in Criminalizing Membership
The Left in America continues its sprint to the outermost radical fringes. Last week, San Francisco officially labelled the NRA a “terrorist organization.” Now, Rasmussen Reports reveals that 32% of Democrats polled “favor declaring the gun rights group a terrorist organization.” Even worse, 28% of them would imprison people for joining the nation’s oldest civil rights organization.

So much for freedom of association.

The Democrats are single-handily helping to revive the NRA. It should die out from the horrible corruption and utter uselessness, but now they are giving it shock therapy.

Hell, they have given them plenty of ammunition to recruit legions of people just to piss off the progressives.
 
Grab the popcorn and enjoy the nuttiness of Alyssa Milano .. as she discusses Gun issues with Ted Cruz

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Dear Supporter,

The current firearms law reform is being pushed through by the Government as a direct result of the horrific events that occurred in Christchurch six months ago.

Right now, a Royal Commission is looking into the events, and what lessons can be learned. The Commission has a mandate to make significant recommendations to the Government which may include even more law changes, restrictions and bans that affect you as a firearms owner. We are worried that a number of groups will try to simplify the issue, blame firearms, and call on further bans and restrictions.

Earlier today we publicly released the submission made by the Council of Licenced Firearms Owners

At the bottom of this email is a copy of our media release linking to the text of the lengthy submission.

In short, we submit that a key failing was the Police’s lack of prudence in their assessment of Brendan Tarrant as a ‘fit and proper’ person to own firearms.

We argue that rather than new laws to ban firearms, or further regulation of the fit and proper test, the Police (or another suitable agency) should be properly resourced enabling them to focus on ensuring good administration of the Arms Act. We suggested that administration and vetting changes implemented post-2015 have potentially made passing the Police vetting significantly easier.

We have drafted a customisable submission template for you to send the Commission – it only takes a few minutes to ensure your voice as a responsible firearms owner is heard.

Ideally, we would like to highlight for the Commissioners the difficulty in passing Police vetting prior to 2015, and compare that to the relaxed processes Police have used since then (and what we understand enabled Brenton Tarrant to get a firearms licence, despite clear warning signs that he should not have been assessed as meeting the ‘fit and proper’ test).

> Click here to make a submission to the Royal Commission <
Our lawyers have advised us that the Commission will not publicly release submissions or personal details of submitters and all information will be stored on a secure database. Similarly, we will hold your information in the strictest confidence.

So please take a moment to use the online submission tool our team has created to ensure the Royal Commission is left in no doubt that responsible firearms owners like you share an interest in a safer New Zealand, but that it is unlikely to be achieved by further crackdowns on the enjoyment of firearms-based hobbies by law-abiding firearms owners.

Thank you for your support.

COLFO
 
Beta just ended his campaign and made a million AR-15s fly off the shelves:

Then: I don't want to take your guns... Now: Hell yes, we're gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This is double funny because:

Divided Democrats Step Back From Assault Weapons Ban
WASHINGTON — As Democrats make an aggressive push for new gun control legislation, they have made a calculated decision to stop short of pursuing their most ambitious goal: an assault weapons ban.

The overwhelming majority of House Democrats — 211, seven shy of the 218 needed for passage — are co-sponsoring legislation to ban military-style semiautomatic weapons, similar to the ban in effect from 1994 to 2004.

But some centrist Democrats remain skittish about any proposal that keeps firearms from law-abiding citizens — a frequent charge against Democrats by Republicans and gun rights groups — making any such ban politically risky for moderates in Trump-friendly districts. In the Senate, it draws less support.
 
As you may have seen, tonight the Government announced the details of a new wave of firearms laws.

We are working through what they’ve said and provide some initial comments below. If you’d like it from the horse’s mouth, you can read the official statement on the Beehive website here.

Cynical Timing

The timing of the announcement is cynical. Governments always release bad news on Friday afternoons, hoping people will just want to have a drink and start the weekend. The Government also knows this announcement will be drowned out by its own scandals this week.

Another Rushed Process

Some media are reporting the Select Committee process will take five months instead of the usual six. This is better than the three proposed initially. It's much better than April's one week process. However, it appears they want the law to be passed for the March 15 Anniversary. Again the Government is putting political theatre ahead of good lawmaking practice.

Should Have Waited for the Royal Commission

The Government should have waited for the results of the Royal Commission it set up in response to the March 15 tragedy. That Royal Commission was set up to find out what went wrong. It makes no sense to introduce law changes without learning from the Royal Commission. It makes no sense to have a Royal Commission if you are not going to heed it when making laws.

Introducing a Registry

The biggest change is the promise to introduce a registry within two years. We know, from overseas experience, that this is futile . If you are not a fit and proper person you should not have any firearm even if it is registered. If you are a fit and proper person, what difference does it make if your firearm is registered?

Punishing the Law Abiding

The announcement says the punishment for owning a firearm without a license will increase to $15,000 or one year in prison. However, the punishment for entering wrong information into the new registry is $20,000 or three years in prison. The Government is again punishing the law abiding. Almost the entire announcement is focused on people who own firearms legally. There is almost nothing about actual criminals.

A Right or a Privilege?

The announcement says the law will confirm that owning a firearm is a privilege. A fundamental principal of the law in a free society is that you can do anything not expressly forbidden. Saying our rights are actually privileges granted by the Government is an extremely disturbing trend. We are not aware of any other area in law where doing something is said to be ‘a privilege.’ In ACT’s view the Government is continuing its scapegoating of Licensed Firearm Owners.

Political Persecution

The Announcement says license holders can be red flagged for ‘extremism.’ Who judges what an extreme view is? In the long term, this may be the most worrying part of all.

More Bureaucracy for Clubs

Clubs are some of the most important institutions for promoting the safe use of firearms. Informal agreements between police and pistol clubs have worked well. Clubs will now face new regulation that, ironically, will make it less attractive to form, run, and grow clubs.

A Possible Positive

We had heard that the planned advisory committee would be appointed by the Police Commissioner and contain bureaucrats. Now it appears it will be a group including firearm owners. We’ll suggest that at least some members should be elected by those who hold licenses.

What the Government Should have Done

Thank you again for supporting ACT’s Fair Firearm Law campaign. ACT developed this policy with members of the licensed firearm community. We are campaigning to implement it after the election and reverse damaging changes. We think that will still be possible (the Government says the registry will take two years to build, and that’s just the initial, hopeful projection that all Government IT projects start with).

You Can Help

Please use the ideas here to persuade others the latest amendment is wrong. It punishes the wrong people and is more about political theatre than public safety. Feel free to forward this email and invite more people to sign up to the campaign at:https://fairfirearmlaws.act.org.nz
 

Similar threads

Back
Top