Terror News about terrorism

The man has been living in Germany for many years, and according to initial information he was not considered by the authorities to be an extremist, although according to Bild, Saudi Arabia has warned the German authorities about the attacker because of his views posted on X.
Some of this means they sent an email saying "listen, there's another suspicious person here". T
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm still baffled by that drivel of his about Socrates.

A total nutcase, it looks like.

Until his rant, it could somehow "make sense" of what he was trying to communicate.

But then Socrates happened, and he turned into a Bill and Tedd moment...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Until his rant, it could somehow "make sense" of what he was trying to communicate.

But then Socrates happened, and he turned into a Bill and Tedd moment...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
It's now emerged the perp was due to appear in court on December 19 on a charge of misusing emergency hotlines. It seems that he dialled 110 like three times a day to report he was "being followed".

And as has become wont in these cases, he'd been reported numerous times to the authorities for death threats.

But no one could do anything because some shrink diagnosed him with schizophrenia, and privacy protection laws in this country basically ensure the police will never hear of someone's mental diseases until it's far too late.

The right to controlling one's information is Germany's equivalent of 'Murica's 2nd amendment. We just won't touch it no matter the collateral damage.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Well I was right. If Islamophopic people actually starts knocking off civilians with a car then we should really worry about actual jihadists…
 
Atheists use phrases like "oh my god", too.
 
"Allahu Ackbar" isn't used (never afaik) in that sense.

It is something along the line of an acclamation, taking God as your witness, praising him. To some broad extent "Deus Vult", though not exactly that.

"Oh my god" is not much different than "sh*"/"f**k"/"dayum"/etc...

We used to say "don't speak the name of the Lord in vain", but Muslims took it literally and then some by 1- not speaking the name of the Lord in vain, 2- adding a long litany of praises after each mention of his name "praise Allah, Alhamdulillah, etc..."


So, if the dude indeed said "allahu ackbar", and it is very hard to say for sure if he did or not (we can hear a "-bar", but nothing much before that), that would be to praise his god for the action he (the terrorist) did in his (the god) name.
 
How it was reported here right winger, act same as the truck several years ago ommiting muslim behind that wheel. They nuance it till it fits their illusion. But then the public thinks its reality.
 
1000013661.webp
 

Similar threads

Back
Top