So it's the ho.
Gents, just a suggestion for those who presumably will try a duel of wits with the mentally unarmed:
The women and their cucks/simps are going to be voting for a vagina and a non white person. Be prepared to be recipients for the ad hominem if you disagree with anything they say in support of whatever BS Harris says. It's far easier to attack the person than to actually have a real position to discuss why they disagree with the message being spoken against the SJW whore.
Anyone here remember Obama the divider in chief and his supporters? Disagree with him for his actions and behavior and we were called a racist despite our issues being against the person and not his skin color.
They will do the same only this time it will be not only her gender but also her skin color.
Argue smartly by first dissecting their logical fallacies and then concentrate of telling that anyone using a fallacy especially the personal attack, does so because they really have no other position to use. Sane people with strong foundations to debate with from where they stand, will not use a fallacy. Debate them smartly folks, and let the public know if on social media, that you took a feeble minded person to task for their BS and now debunked derp.
She hopes, anyway.
