Yeah, by actually invading Ukraine Russia pushed it out not the other way around. The whole concept of western society and principles on which the EU (and US for the most part) is based was the driver of social unrest during the 2014 events, not someone's involvement. Yes there was a lot of effort and support from the EU but it was consequence of those events not the spark that triggered it. To put it simple - Ukrainians wanted to live more like their western neighbours rather than those in the east. It's funny because considering the fact how many wealthy Russians buy real estates, assets and educate their children in the west making the same factual choice as the Ukrainians did.
And yes, what Russia does (as in many other places around the region- Abkhasia, Transnistria, Georgia, South Ossetia and in a way - Armenia) is the inflammation of the so called "Russkyi Mir" which means it is deeply interested in fueling the internal conflict in a bordering country so it does not fall into western sphere of influence beacause Russia itself cannot offer anything which is roughly comparable to the "western style of life". So in Ukraine it is not an internal conflict that burning only by itself. And to be honest, this is quite understandable from the Russian perspective beacuse it wants the buffer zone to exist and to be as large as possible.
The clandestine actions of main world powers is another story and for sure they there was a lot of influence from all interested parties.
Ukrainians did not one day wake up on 2013 and suddenly decide "Oh, lets burn Kiev down because, suddenly, I want to live like in EU."
The fact of the matter is that there was a lot of effort from the west aimed at creating an illusion, that if the society overthrows a pro-Russian regime, they will be pushed into EU-paradise as a consequence. This was never the case, but the EU made virtually zero efforts to clarify this.
There were no EU politicians or representatives going to Maidan, going on stage and saying "Wait guys. We won't really make you a EU member. And no, we won't provide you with German salaries." Instead, there was a one-sided push from both US and EU politicians and information sphere, aimed at demonizing Russia and glorifying the west. In traditional terms, this is called "propaganda", when you tell half-truths to twist society's political consciousness into a particular direction.
It was psychological warfare aimed at the population, to flip a country, that was for many years deeply integrated into Russia's economic and political sphere. Once the gig worked and brought its fruits in the form of a coup d'état, accompanied with violence against the police and pro-Russian demonstrators, all within the context of the emergence of radicals in positions of power, Russia at that point no longer cared about the opinion of the Ukrainian society, because as I said, it was futile to believe that Russia can counter the brainwashing that has already been dealt to the average Joe in Kiev.
To assume that Russia is genuinely interested in having its backyard in flames is a deep misinterpretation of eastern geopolitics. Russia can and will only profit from an environment that is politically and economically friendly to it. And this is understood not only by Russia, but also by the US.