• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you

Politics Daily News

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
You don't say? I wonder why...🤔
I have some reasons why. But will refrain.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
You don't say? I wonder why...🤔
I have some reasons why. But will refrain.
Considering the fact that the birth rates of the entire world are in free fall, including in ultra-conservative countries like Iran and Algeria, and in states like North Korea where women are duty-bound to have children, I'd say the answer is probably not simple.
 
The paper is wrong, there were at least 200,000 of us out there, even if the government had installed facial recognition in China and threatened reprisals against participants.
Fun fact: the hand-controlled police banned the demonstration, yet hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators went out.
The government hoped that the event would turn violent, so it allowed far-right groups to demonstrate in the same place. They did turn up, 35 in total at two locations, but were dispersed by police. One of these groups of about 20 people occupied one of the bridges over the Danube, but the police solved the problem, and herded the crowd to the other bridge, see picture... Note: the demonstration was not only about LGBTQ rights (although eighty percent of the population, for example, support gay marriage), but was a trial by fire of the Orbán regime: to try to suppress any anti-regime social movement in an approximately Belarusian way. P.S.: the picture shows only a small part of the crowd.
1751183993193.webp
 
Last edited:
I read a local newspaper article a few days ago.

A man has been acquitted for the rape of a young woman. The woman is mentally handicapped and it was determined by experts that she is not capable of giving consent. The judge ruled that there was a lack of evidence. This greatly upset the victims family. Meanwhile the victim stood up from her chair. This was a bit difficult, seeing as how she is pregnant ... with the defendant's child.

Both are of the culturally enriched variety, so I'm sure this'll be the last time we hear of anything connected to this case ... 🫣
 
A severe beating soon to happen in Merseyside? You'd think pub customers could administer a serious a$$ kicking and teach the dummy good manners!
Article describes some mentally deficient moron upsetting visitors to the beach.
 
A severe beating soon to happen in Merseyside? You'd think pub customers could administer a serious a$$ kicking and teach the dummy good manners!
Article describes some mentally deficient moron upsetting visitors to the beach.

Unfortunately perverts, voyeurs creeps everywhere around the world. This goes noticed and a thousand more don’t and won’t ever make headline.

Few years ago in Portugal some local dude was shamelessly grabbing his dick under his Speedo while looking at young women in bikinis. The women noticed and left. They were likely foreigners to Portugal and didn’t call the cops. Plenty such examples.
 
I read a local newspaper article a few days ago.

A man has been acquitted for the rape of a young woman. The woman is mentally handicapped and it was determined by experts that she is not capable of giving consent. The judge ruled that there was a lack of evidence. This greatly upset the victims family. Meanwhile the victim stood up from her chair. This was a bit difficult, seeing as how she is pregnant ... with the defendant's child.

Both are of the culturally enriched variety, so I'm sure this'll be the last time we hear of anything connected to this case ... 🫣

Woman is mentally handicapped.
She gets raped.
The perp's attorney claims she can't be raped because she can't give consent because she is handicapped.

Attorneys and lawyers are de-facto "scumbags", since they will defend their client no matter what. That's their job.

But for the judge to go "hum... I dunno! this whole thing does not seem very convincing to me! I will need more evidence! hur hur dur", that's just awfully dumb.

Though, since it was mentioned they are "both of the culturally enriched variety" (is that a racist thing to say? are we going to get in trouble for stating facts?) that might have been why the judge decided to suddenly find himself into a moral and judicial pickle with regards to "evidence".

Apple carts are so easy to upset these days, sometimes it is necessary to commit a few injustices for the greater good. 🤷‍♂️
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top