- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 102
- Points
- 59
That sounds exactly like something he would do. Like stealing a march on them.
Politics All Things Trump
- Thread starter BravoZulu
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
But at the same time it could have been risky, especially after his post on truth-social, calling for people to protest.
That could have backfired.
In the end more counter-protesters showed up than protesters (how were there anyway, barely a handful?), but the left is really trigger happy when it comes to that. Surprisingly enough though, Trump's call didn't get picked up by the Media that much.
translate it,,
The Popadanci novels are also based on time travel, but there are no paradoxes, no philosophy, no moral dilemmas; the only function of the science fiction motif is to lead up to the real subject, the rewriting of history. Time travel porn in the service of propaganda.
telex.hu
The Popadanci novels are also based on time travel, but there are no paradoxes, no philosophy, no moral dilemmas; the only function of the science fiction motif is to lead up to the real subject, the rewriting of history. Time travel porn in the service of propaganda.
Hitler elvtárs esete az orosz időutazás-pornóval
Szürreális utazás az orosz ponyvairodalom mélyére, ahol sci-fiből, nyugatellenes propagandából és sztálinizmusból építik a háborús pszichózist már vagy 15 éve. A mai orosz hadsereg katonái jórészt ezeket olvasva nőttek fel. Bemutatjuk az orosz propagandagépezet egyik fontos és nyugaton jórészt...
telex.hu
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
Trump's charges, an explainer and thoughts:
From what I hear, this is the jury charge for Donald Trump’s indictment.
New York PL § 175.10, FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE 1ST DEGREE.
INTENT is an element, which is why they need Michael Cohen.
This is the felony charge which requires, as another element, that it was done to cover up a crime.
PL § 175.05 is 2nd degree and a misdemeanor, lacking that second element. The attempt to elevate it to a Class E Felony, is solely to get around the statute of limitations clock which, Bragg will argue, tolled when Trump was out of state.
A biased judge can let the indictment stand. but appeals, if he’s convicted, would be another matter.
Bragg’s entire case will rest on Trump covering up a campaign finance crime which the FEC said didn’t happen. Between that, and the timing, appeals are a no brainer, as in NY, the state constitution guarantees a speedy trial, and federally, it’s a clear cut 6th amendment argument.
I don’t think Trump is in any peril. It’s a joke of a case and a political hit job as is obvious to everyone (with a functioning brain that is), even CNN! It won’t hold up.
But they’re betting everything on it, and I’ll want revenge.
Pendulums bruh.
They’re not trying to get him to win the nomination with this. They really do want to prevent him from ever running. That’s obvious. I know a lot of very smart conservatives say this is a play to get him the nomination so they can beat him. It’s not.
They’re using this, Georgia’s laughingstock, and the special counsel over classified docs, to try to kneecap him.
That’s obvious by now. They actually are trying to use a corrupt justice system to eliminate and imprison a political opponent and opposition leader.
This is incomprehensibly bad and they don’t fear the other half of the country.
Here is some of the case law in NY that Bragg will use to defeat statute of limitations, which is 5 yrs. He has to argue that the clock tolled when Trump was out of state. There is some precedent, but this is unique. Misdemeanor was 2 years. Hence the elevation to felony.
If Bragg is ballsy and Isikoff was given wrong info or the language was off, he could try NY PL § 175.35, or OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE. Jury charge below.
This is a Class D felony but it’s OFFERING instead of just FALSIFYING. So, highly unlikely.
Bragg MUST prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump had the intent to cover up a crime. Mens rea is a required element. Unless new evidence came up, Michael Cohen, admitted perjurer and liar, may be the only witness for such a claim.
So: Can any of these cases stop Trump?
No.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.
>POTUS must be:
- Natural born citizen
- 35 yrs old
- Resident for 14 yrs.
SCOTUS bars congress from adding requirements, like a clean criminal record. He could run from jail.
From what I hear, this is the jury charge for Donald Trump’s indictment.
New York PL § 175.10, FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE 1ST DEGREE.
INTENT is an element, which is why they need Michael Cohen.
This is the felony charge which requires, as another element, that it was done to cover up a crime.
PL § 175.05 is 2nd degree and a misdemeanor, lacking that second element. The attempt to elevate it to a Class E Felony, is solely to get around the statute of limitations clock which, Bragg will argue, tolled when Trump was out of state.
A biased judge can let the indictment stand. but appeals, if he’s convicted, would be another matter.
Bragg’s entire case will rest on Trump covering up a campaign finance crime which the FEC said didn’t happen. Between that, and the timing, appeals are a no brainer, as in NY, the state constitution guarantees a speedy trial, and federally, it’s a clear cut 6th amendment argument.
I don’t think Trump is in any peril. It’s a joke of a case and a political hit job as is obvious to everyone (with a functioning brain that is), even CNN! It won’t hold up.
But they’re betting everything on it, and I’ll want revenge.
Pendulums bruh.
They’re not trying to get him to win the nomination with this. They really do want to prevent him from ever running. That’s obvious. I know a lot of very smart conservatives say this is a play to get him the nomination so they can beat him. It’s not.
They’re using this, Georgia’s laughingstock, and the special counsel over classified docs, to try to kneecap him.
That’s obvious by now. They actually are trying to use a corrupt justice system to eliminate and imprison a political opponent and opposition leader.
This is incomprehensibly bad and they don’t fear the other half of the country.
Here is some of the case law in NY that Bragg will use to defeat statute of limitations, which is 5 yrs. He has to argue that the clock tolled when Trump was out of state. There is some precedent, but this is unique. Misdemeanor was 2 years. Hence the elevation to felony.
If Bragg is ballsy and Isikoff was given wrong info or the language was off, he could try NY PL § 175.35, or OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE. Jury charge below.
This is a Class D felony but it’s OFFERING instead of just FALSIFYING. So, highly unlikely.
Bragg MUST prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump had the intent to cover up a crime. Mens rea is a required element. Unless new evidence came up, Michael Cohen, admitted perjurer and liar, may be the only witness for such a claim.
So: Can any of these cases stop Trump?
No.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.
>POTUS must be:
- Natural born citizen
- 35 yrs old
- Resident for 14 yrs.
SCOTUS bars congress from adding requirements, like a clean criminal record. He could run from jail.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Messages
- 2,300
- Points
- 259
wrong thread, dude.translate it,,
The Popadanci novels are also based on time travel, but there are no paradoxes, no philosophy, no moral dilemmas; the only function of the science fiction motif is to lead up to the real subject, the rewriting of history. Time travel porn in the service of propaganda.
Hitler elvtárs esete az orosz időutazás-pornóval
Szürreális utazás az orosz ponyvairodalom mélyére, ahol sci-fiből, nyugatellenes propagandából és sztálinizmusból építik a háborús pszichózist már vagy 15 éve. A mai orosz hadsereg katonái jórészt ezeket olvasva nőttek fel. Bemutatjuk az orosz propagandagépezet egyik fontos és nyugaton jórészt...
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2022
- Messages
- 39
- Points
- 64
Will it be live on tv today?
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
During the trial, no.
The prosecution asked for no tv cameras, and Trump's defense said they didn't mind.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
34 charges might seem like a lot, but keep in mind the prosecution only dogpile charges when it knows none of them will stick.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
Yielding to Temptation: Why The Trump Case is a Test Not Just for the President but the Legal System
Below is my column in Fox.com on the indictment of former President Donald Trump and how this case is a test not just for Trump but the New York legal system. Here is the column:
jonathanturley.org
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Messages
- 2,300
- Points
- 259
Yielding to Temptation: Why The Trump Case is a Test Not Just for the President but the Legal System
Below is my column in Fox.com on the indictment of former President Donald Trump and how this case is a test not just for Trump but the New York legal system. Here is the column:
Lavrentiy Beria would be proud...
one of the comments pointed out, that Trump's defense have an opportunity to depose quite a few people on both sides that may rather not be in the spotlight, and that if enough of these situations exist, it will hopefully serve to put a damper on the future weaponization of the legal system for political purposes....
whatever the case, it will be a circus. its my prediction that Trump WILL be found guilty, and that the results will not be clear cut, will not serve to clear the water...
it will serve its purpose by putting the republican party in a position to lose big in 2024.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
Beria: show me the man I'll show you the crime.
Bragg: show me the man.
Funnily enough, it's textbook straight out of the Gulag Archipelago. You are charged with a crime, the crime for which you are being charged. You don't which crime? The one for which you are being charged, and you will be sentenced accordingly. We won't tell you, because you don't need to know. All that matters is you committed a crime and being charged for it.
Bragg: show me the man.
Funnily enough, it's textbook straight out of the Gulag Archipelago. You are charged with a crime, the crime for which you are being charged. You don't which crime? The one for which you are being charged, and you will be sentenced accordingly. We won't tell you, because you don't need to know. All that matters is you committed a crime and being charged for it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Messages
- 2,300
- Points
- 259
I read repeatedly, ad nauseam, over and over, that Trump keeps "getting away" with things, which I guess is due to him being investigated and accused so many times, and the fact that he HASNT been convicted of anything, rather than being exonerating and evidence of a political witch hunt with no basis, is instead interpreted as "getting away"... even people that should know better seem to think that constantly being accused is itself evidence of guilt...
if these people knew any history, they might see some parallels with the soviet union, and other totalitarian states.... they also dont have enough sense to think that someday the tables may be turned, and it may be THEY that are the target....
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2018
- Messages
- 9,453
- Points
- 328
Well....
rumble.com
DATA: 20% Shift To Trump Among Democrats Since February.
DATA: 20% Shift To Trump Among Democrats Since February.
rumble.com
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,362
- Points
- 338
Oh right, the lawyer who perjured himself and lied before congress? The lawyer who got disbarred?
Peak credible witness there.
Similar threads
