Politics All Things Trump

[primer]

Its usual for law to use the term whats best for society and this can include accepting a loss for a greater gain. To give each one due process will take 75 years and god know the cost.
The dems caused it.
They know how to game it.. simply claim afraid to go back or some other litany of loop holes.

 

[Telmar]

Court proceedings may take too long, have too many, appeals possible for anything but when you start accepting that a government employee decides your fate alone, you should start thinking bad things can happen to you or your family too....

EDIT: I mean people creamed their pants when there were some COVID restrictions such as wearing a mask and you could get fined for not wearing one...but sending some dude, who may not be a a gang member, who may have legal status in the USA to be sent in a jail in El Salvador...yeah sure OK...

 

[primer]

Have we ever known the courts to refuse more money? Trump said it is a worse racket and yet there is not much more than a peep of a complaint from polititians.
This guy needs to have a day in court according to the courts when he has admitted to enough to be deported? Serial domestic abuse and terrorist gang affiliation. These people sell drugs so are the worse scum. In many jurisdictions thats automatic death row. Also said he was not worried about going back. Its pure and proven demagogeury.

 

[HorniePonie]

Its usual for law to use the term whats best for society and this can include accepting a loss for a greater gain. To give each one due process will take 75 years and god know the cost.
The dems caused it.
They know how to game it.. simply claim afraid to go back or some other litany of loop holes.

The US knows how to game it. It was "the best for society" to take enemy fighters straight to gitmo too.

It's not about pampering the terrorists / gang members / rapists / presidential felons. It's about protecting the society from gradually becoming an oppressive dystopia. Bypassing due process can become the norm.

 

[Picanha]

Go back to Kindergarten and snitch all other kids there.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Seldomly seen such cases of extreme narcissm coupled with Führerkult in a US administration.

Only competence needed unquestionable loyality no matter what happened.

Its all 10x worse than what you accused Biden of.

 

[Picanha]

Far from that. He's the best SecDef in my memory. The fact that you and all your buddies don't like him, makes me like him even more.....if that's even possible.

Can you please list some of his "achievements"?

 

[Picanha]

The US knows how to game it. It was "the best for society" to take enemy fighters straight to gitmo too.

It's not about pampering the terrorists / gang members / rapists / presidential felons. It's about protecting the society from gradually becoming an oppressive dystopia. Bypassing due process can become the norm.

People using all sorts of out of KGBs ass propaganda news to inform themselves won't realize that.

They are in fact the vehicle to get to this point.

 

[Picanha]

Back and forth back and forth in the end pedalling back

Kursrallye an der Börse: Dax und SAP Aktie mit Kurssprung nach Kehrtwende von Trump

Dax und die Aktie von SAP legen kräftig zu. Die Futures für Nasdaq und Dow Jones klettern nach der gestrigen Kursrallye weiter, da US-Präsident nicht nur im Zollstreit mit China, sondern auch im Konflikt mit der Notenbank Fed zurückrudert.

www.manager-magazin.de

 

[Chazman]

Can you please list some of his "achievements"?

I'm assuming you mean as SecDef.


In just a few weeks, he has driven "wokeness" and DEI out of the military. No small feat, as it had become ingrained in it's political structure since the Obama years and then codified by Biden. Lots of hurt feelings when you turn the military back into a meritocracy focused on lethality and not a weird social experiment. He has done that by laying down the law and firing whoever required firing without hesitation. It's all about merit now and the mission to increase lethality in the armed forces.

As a result, recruitment has skyrocketed. The US Army has fallen short of minimum requirements by 30-40,000 per year. They kept lowering standards and lowering recruitment goals to make the numbers work. Few red blooded American Patriots, (exactly who you'd want), wanted to join a force who's primary mission was wokeness, climate change and diversity. Now recruitment is at record levels with the military having to expand training programs to accept them all. And they need them badly.

For 4 years the military's motto was "Diversity is our strength". On day one, Pete said, fvck that, "Unity and focus on the mission is our strength". He wants a strong, lethal military, filled with warriors, and not to be squandered in "forever wars" that make the corrupt politicos rich at the expense of our sons and daughters. That also creates powerful enemies.

Did I mention Pete's a stud with big balls? I might have. He is exactly the right person at this time and place for the job.

But as you can imagine, flipping over the kitchen table while you're eating can create a lot of butthurt and the knives are out for him. That's okay, he's up for it. And.....his boss is behind him 100%.

 

[HorniePonie]

I'm assuming you mean as SecDef.


In just a few weeks, he has driven "wokeness" and DEI out of the military. No small feat, as it had become ingrained in it's political structure since the Obama years and then codified by Biden. Lots of hurt feelings when you turn the military back into a meritocracy focused on lethality and not a weird social experiment. He has done that by laying down the law and firing whoever required firing without hesitation. It's all about merit now and the mission to increase lethality in the armed forces.

As a result, recruitment has skyrocketed. The US Army has fallen short of minimum requirements by 30-40,000 per year. They kept lowering standards and lowering recruitment goals to make the numbers work. Few red blooded American Patriots, (exactly who you'd want), wanted to join a force who's primary mission was wokeness and diversity. Now recruitment is at record levels with the military having to expand training programs to accept them all. And they need them badly.

For 4 years the military's motto was "Diversity is our strength". On day one, Pete said, fvck that, "Unity and focus on the mission is our strength". He wants a strong, lethal military, filled with warriors, but not to be squandered in forever wars that make the corrupt rich at the expense of our sons and daughters. That also creates powerful enemies.

Did I mention Pete's a stud with big balls? I might have. He is exactly the right person at this time and place for the job.

But as you can imagine, flipping over the kitchen table while you're eating can create a lot of butthurt and the knives are out for him. That's okay, he's up for it. And.....his boss is behind him 100%.

Dude, it still sounds a bit odd to list being a stud with big testicles as one of his achievements.

"
Stud
noun
a handsome man with an attractive physique; a hunk.
"

 

[Chazman]

Dude, it still sounds a bit odd to list being a stud with big testicles as one of his achievements.

"
Stud
noun
a handsome man with an attractive physique; a hunk.
"

Like I said, it's an Americanism. If everyone here were American, I could say, "He's a stud", and that would be all I'd need to say.

It basically means, he courageous, righteous and don't eff with him.

 

[primer]

The US knows how to game it. It was "the best for society" to take enemy fighters straight to gitmo too.

It's not about pampering the terrorists / gang members / rapists / presidential felons. It's about protecting the society from gradually becoming an oppressive dystopia. Bypassing due process can become the norm.

US is the most litigous society on the planet, make it more litigous is better?
The fact that they can pull this back to the court prooves it. But let stupidity rule the day and how much better are we off is the real question.
There are many examples of impractical laws and regulations aswell, these exist due to the cloak of bureaucratic process and the system becomes the burden.
Trump asked the agencies to eliminate two regulations for each one new regulation issued. Deregulation by the evidence of this case is a perfect response.
Its a stupid law when the illegal migrant has already legally provided the reason to deport. The real result it is a case to further wreck the USA pushed by dems.
Well if you want real process they should be sued and costs to Trump admin for frivolous merit. I like the broad scope of it and what some 5 years and millions after counter claims terminate we still might not see the end.
Dems expect the same for each migrant, and by the numbers not enough courts exist. Murderers shall run free as their cases exceed limitation.

 

[Hiryu2.0]

Hegseth orders makeup studio installed at Pentagon

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has not given any press briefings in the briefing room but has used the room as a backdrop for TV hits with Fox News.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Chazman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Hiryu2.0]

 

[haze99]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Picanha]

I'm assuming you mean as SecDef.


In just a few weeks, he has driven "wokeness" and DEI out of the military. No small feat, as it had become ingrained in it's political structure since the Obama years and then codified by Biden. Lots of hurt feelings when you turn the military back into a meritocracy focused on lethality and not a weird social experiment. He has done that by laying down the law and firing whoever required firing without hesitation. It's all about merit now and the mission to increase lethality in the armed forces.

As a result, recruitment has skyrocketed. The US Army has fallen short of minimum requirements by 30-40,000 per year. They kept lowering standards and lowering recruitment goals to make the numbers work. Few red blooded American Patriots, (exactly who you'd want), wanted to join a force who's primary mission was wokeness, climate change and diversity. Now recruitment is at record levels with the military having to expand training programs to accept them all. And they need them badly.

For 4 years the military's motto was "Diversity is our strength". On day one, Pete said, fvck that, "Unity and focus on the mission is our strength". He wants a strong, lethal military, filled with warriors, and not to be squandered in "forever wars" that make the corrupt politicos rich at the expense of our sons and daughters. That also creates powerful enemies.

Did I mention Pete's a stud with big balls? I might have. He is exactly the right person at this time and place for the job.

But as you can imagine, flipping over the kitchen table while you're eating can create a lot of butthurt and the knives are out for him. That's okay, he's up for it. And.....his boss is behind him 100%.

Thanks for the reply so basically just DEI removal? I can agree with that to some extent but nothing earth shattering.

I searched a bit and 14000 of the new recruits are DEP from 2024.

Let's wait and see if you get 70 - 80k in 2025 then yes a success otherwise probably undermining future recruiting efforts.

I see DEI as means to get more recruits as the military is not so popular a job.

I served in a conscription army but I also know the modern army as a reservist.

There are people there which probably would have been not accepted in the past when you had hundreds of thousands of conscripts.

And I really don't see a big problem there if it's all managed well.

A problem arises when skills and capabilities don't count anymore.

 

[Chazman]

Thanks for the reply so basically just DEI removal? I can agree with that to some extent but nothing earth shattering.

I searched a bit and 14000 of the new recruits are DEP from 2024.

Let's wait and see if you get 70 - 80k in 2025 then yes a success otherwise probably undermining future recruiting efforts.

I see DEI as means to get more recruits as the military is not so popular a job.

I served in a conscription army but I also know the modern army as a reservist.

There are people there which probably would have been not accepted in the past when you had hundreds of thousands of conscripts.

And I really don't see a big problem there if it's all managed well.

A problem arises when skills and capabilities don't count anymore.

Actually, DEI is not a means to get more recruits, it hinders it.

The US has an all volunteer military and has for decades. It depends on the generations of patriots who fill it's ranks, year after year. In some respects, it's a family business where grandfather and father and now son or daughter volunteer. They are there to serve and defend the US Constitution and the American People. Not be indoctrinated in Marxist concepts, trans sexualism, diversity, (as in all white males are racists and should be purged), etc. Billions of dollars as well as valuable time were expended in training these concepts in our military. In the mean time, $2 billion warships are left to rust due to environment concerns and "climate change". That's been rescinded as well, BTW.

"Just DEI"? I think you have no idea just how hard that is to remove root and branch from an organization like the Pentagon. Deep State players still remain however. But it's only been 90 days.

 

[thelistener]

Actually, DEI is not a means to get more recruits, it hinders it.

The US army,marines, airforce and navy went over their recruitments goals in 2024? I saw your comment by you pointing otherwise. Which is it?

DEI is loaded term, but an effort to get, for example more women, doesn't have to be a deep state scheme but just wise policy to get more service members.

 

[Chazman]

The US army,marines, airforce and navy went over their recruitments goals in 2024? I saw comments by you or limacharles pointing otherwise. Which is it?

DEI is loaded term, but an effort to get, for example more women, doesn't have to be a deep state scheme but just wise policy to get more service members.

View attachment 525827

It's easy to go over your recruitment goals if you are constantly lowering goals - which they have been. The chart you supply even shows recruitment nose diving.

Women are definitely needed and are important component to any military. The problem arises with dual standards. For example, if a female doesn't meet physical standards to be an infantryman and gets in to make a political statement, she is a danger to herself and her unit. Pete just signed an order a couple of weeks ago that there should be one physical standard for combat arms.