I can't believe you trying to push these "peaceful protesters" crap again.
Kazakhstan is the most developed central asian state (they actually quite close to Russia, most rich post-soviet state, except for baltic states).
I see stark resemblance with other country that was ruined by Western-supported "protest". One of the most developed country in the Northern Africa - Lybia. That "revolution" worked very well for them, for sure.
Not this time m-fuckers. You failed in Syria, failed in Venezuela, failed in Belarus, failed in A-stan and you will fail in K-stan.
What would/could suggest the unrest in K-stan implicate Western intervention though?
Let's take, for instance, what happened to Ukraine. We can easily rationalize how and why the situation became what it became, be it from European pov, US pov, Russia pov: ethnicity, energy, EU membership, NATO membership, Ukraine being a buffer zone between "The West" and Russia, reforms, etc...
We can make sense of what happened due to a fairly long and extensive Europe/West-Ukraine-Russia History.
But what about K-stan?
Apart from an increase in energy prices, what could have been the reason for such violence to brutally erupt?
I guess, an hypothesis could be: let's start something in K-stan, right at Russia's door in order to
relieve the Ukrainian/Belorussian front.
But while the Ukrainian/Belorussian situation is right in between Europe and Russia, the Kazak theater is, so to speak, fairly remote and surrounded by countries with, so to speak, still fairly strong ties with Russia.
To me the "unrest triggered and started by Western agents" does not make much sense at the moment, considering what we factually know happened.