Mil News Australia, NZ, Oceania Military News

20210730adf8623994_04382.jpg

Now in its tenth iteration, Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and United States military.

Defence says the biennial exercise is an opportunity to exercise high-end, multi-domain warfare capabilities, build and affirm military-to-military ties and interoperability, and strengthen strategic partnerships across the region.

Confirmed participating partner nations in Talisman Sabre 2023 include Fiji, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, France, United Kingdom, Canada and Germany.

The Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will attend as observers, Defence confirmed.

“Talisman Sabre is a practical demonstration of our enduring alliance with the United States, through deepening cooperation in training and innovation,” Deputy Prime Minister, Richard Marles said.

“Australia is excited to host what will be the largest ever iteration of Talisman Sabre this year, involving more of our partner nations than ever before.

“Talisman Sabre reflects a shared commitment to enduring relationships between trusted partners, and a stable Indo-Pacific through an upholding of the rules-based order.”

Talisman Sabre 2023 will run from 22 July to 4 August primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory and New South Wales.

The 14-day exercise will include large scale logistics, multi-domain firepower demonstrations, land combat, amphibious landings and air operations.
https://www.australiandefence.com.au/news/australia-to-host-largest-ever-exercise-talisman-sabre
 
Rheinmetall has won an important order in the maritime protection systems domain. The Royal Australian Navy and the Commonwealth of Australia have ordered the Multi Ammunition Softkill System, or MASS, which will initially be used to equip its Hobart-class destroyers and ANZAC-class frigates. Following extensive trials, MASS was selected on account of its unique capabilities. For Rheinmetall, the order represents €125 million in sales. The first systems are to be delivered by the end of 2023, with full operational capability achieved by 2027. This is the Group’s single-biggest order ever for ship protection technology. Total sales volume could potentially come to A$1 billion (approx. €610 million), as the contract includes an option for equipping Australia’s entire fleet. Because the contract includes the transfer of MASS technology, Rheinmetall Defence Australia will be able to produce the systems under licence, before installing and commissioning them onboard Australia’s seagoing surface combatants.

“The contract, the first naval contract awarded to Rheinmetall Defence Australia represents a significant milestone as the company grows its local industrial footprint with further advanced assembly and training system capabilities in Australia. Rheinmetall is committed to building Australian Industry Capability and creating advanced manufacturing Australian jobs in trades including Mechanical, Electrical, Ammunition and Software”, notes Nathan Poyner, managing director of Rheinmetall Defence Australia.
1683999853614.png
 
Australia will buy 78 Bushmaster protected vehicles for $106 million to replenish stockpiles sent to Ukraine for its war against Russia. Signed at Thales’ facility in Bendigo, the agreement covers the delivery of the Bushmasters in troop carrier and command variants over the next 18 months.

The Bushmaster, designed by Thales, is a highly capable 4×4 wheeled vehicle known for its exceptional blast and ballistic protection, as well as excellent off-road mobility. It has a carrying capacity of up to 10 military personnel and can transport a payload of up to four tonnes (4,000 kilograms/8,000 pounds). With a top speed exceeding 100 kilometres (62 miles) per hour and an operational range of 800 kilometres (497 miles), the Bushmaster is a versatile asset. It is armed with 5.56- and 7.62-millimetre machine guns to support combat missions.

Over 1,200 Bushmasters have already been produced at the Bendigo facility and have proven to be life-saving for the Australian Army, particularly in their operations in the Middle East.

1684585557029.png
 
A Royal Australian Air Force C-17A Globemaster has transported over 60 Vietnamese military personnel deploying to the United Nations Mission (UNMISS) in South Sudan.

The flight, conducted by the Australian Defence Force, has provided a strategic airlift for Vietnamese soldiers and equipment from Ho Chi Minh City to Juba, South Sudan, enabling Vietnam to rotate their staff at the role 2 field hospital.

Vietnam’s President, Võ Văn Thưởng, attended a farewell ceremony held in honour of the peacekeepers departure from Ho Chi Minh City.

Chief of Joint Operations, Lieutenant General Greg Bilton, said Australia and Vietnam’s deepening defence relationship enabled both nations to make an active contribution as regional partners to the maintenance of the global rules-based order.

“Vietnam is an important partner for Australia. We share a strategic interest in maintaining a peaceful and stable Indo-Pacific,” Lieutenant General Bilton said.

“Our militaries work collectively and learn from each other – not only through this close peacekeeping partnership, but also through professional military education and skills exchange programs.”

“This is the fifth year Australia has been able to provide the strategic airlift to assist Vietnam rotate their military personnel through UNMISS. I am proud of the work we are doing together to strengthen our enduring partnership to support the important work of the United Nations.”

2023 marks the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam-Australia diplomatic relationship. Both countries look forward to elevating our cooperation as we seek to establish a peacekeeping partnership, and work more closely together.
1689593273744.png

1689593354154.png

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-eve...orts-vietnam-peacekeeping-mission-south-sudan
 
af8659008_0538.jpg.iifw5JrWMTEf2YtjYBMA.ekXjINZh-o.jpg

The Royal Australian Air Force says it will fly its 24 F/A-18F Super Hornets through to the mid-2030s rather than retiring them by 2027 as had been intended. And it will open up a competition for a replacement rather than necessarily acquiring additional F-35A Lightning IIs. It seems likely that the Block II Super Hornets will be upgraded to full Block III configuration to maximise their capability.

The operational extension has clearly has been under consideration for some time. Most recently, the defence portfolio budget statement made clear that:

During 2023–24, F/A-18F and EA-18G aircraft are scheduled to undergo planned capability upgrades as part of the US Navy-managed Spiral Upgrade Program to ensure the platform’s ongoing lethality and survivability in a contested air combat environment, and to maintain configuration alignment with the United States Navy.

The upgrade will modernise the F/A-18F cockpit with new widescreen displays called the advanced cockpit system or ACS, and incorporate tactical targeting network technology (TTNT) and a distributed targeting processor network (DTP-N) as capable as those in the F-35A. The upgrade is likely to be done in Australia.

The Block III brings a new infrared search and track (IRST) capability to detect targets at greater range without using active radar, as well as enhanced satellite communications, and new fuselage coatings to reduce the radar signature. The airframes are upgraded to extend their service life from 6,000 to 10,000 hours.

The DTP-N and TTNT will give the F/A-18F a rapid growth capability in terms of avionics, computing, and systems architecture. The Block III aircraft can more easily undertake crewed–autonomous teaming with the MQ-28A Ghost Bat, which the defence strategic review said would be further developed under a collaborative program with the US. The new configuration will also make it easier for the aircraft to network with other weapons and platforms.

Australia’s Super Hornets will remain a potent capability, especially when teamed with the Ghost Bat and as a platform for delivering long-range standoff weapons such as the AGM-158C LRASM and AGM-158B JASSM-ER. An air concept of operations could see the F-35A acting as a forward sensor, exploiting its stealth to avoid detection, and then cueing targeting information to upgraded Super Hornets while EA-18G Growlers stop an adversary from using radar systems or sending information to air defences and opposing fighters. A team could also include other specialised electronic warfare aircraft, such as the MC-55 Peregrine and the E-7A Wedgetail, and tankers.

So, what does a force look like beyond the mid-2030s?

The RAAF must continue to develop as an air and space force, with advanced space capabilities playing a key role in command and control and battlespace awareness through intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems. But these projects must avoid the trap of relying only on a small number of high-end, costly and exquisite satellites that are increasingly vulnerable to Chinese and Russian counterspace capabilities.

Defence must complement these high-end capabilities with a ‘small, cheap and many’ approach based on large constellations of small satellites produced locally and ideally launched from Australia on locally developed launch vehicles, enabling rapid augmentation and reconstitution of space capabilities in a crisis. That would make space capabilities more resilient against growing counterspace threats. Then air combat capabilities such as the F/A-18Fs, F-35As and Ghost Bats can more assuredly depend on sovereign and allied space capabilities including positioning, navigation, and timing services from global navigation satellite systems.

It would be a mistake to assume that small numbers of large satellites are somehow immune to attack, and the value of larger constellations of small satellites has been clearly demonstrated by SpaceX’s Starlink supporting Ukrainian operations despite ineffectual Russian attempts to jam it.

Crewed–autonomous teaming needs to be embraced and Defence should support the development and fund the acquisition of sufficient Ghost Bats to complement crewed platforms. The government has indicated that it supports developing a ‘Block 2’ Ghost Bat. That fits neatly into US efforts to develop crewed–autonomous teaming as part of future air combat capabilities including the US Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) project.

The RAAF should join US and other allied sixth-generation projects early. While the F-35A will continue to fly into the 2040s, it would be a missed opportunity for the RAAF to simply rely on that aircraft and ignore important developments in NGAD, the US Navy’s F/A-XX program and the UK-led Global Combat Air Programme.

RAAF chief Air Marshal Robert Chipman has said: ‘We will look at the F-35 and we’re very, very comfortable and very happy with the capability of the F-35. But it would be remiss of me not to look at what else is available for us to replace our Super Hornets in the future.’

With the defence strategic review emphasising ‘impactful projection’ as a key requirement for the ADF’s approach to a ‘focused force’, it’s important for the RAAF to emphasise long-range air dominance and multirole air capability in the post–Super Hornet era. NGAD is almost a return to the days of the interceptor, with range, payload and low observability likely features. Given the vast distances across Australia’s strategic environment, NGAD’s likely supercruise capability at high altitude will enable the RAAF to exploit ‘near space’ for the first time. From there, advanced sensors, communications and weapons such as beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles like the AIM-260 joint advanced tactical missile can be best used for long-range air defence.

Defence white papers, and the recent strategic review, have emphasised strike missions for the RAAF, but air dominance will become increasingly important, especially to counter cruise missiles or forward-deployed combat aircraft and loitering munitions. Having the upgraded F/A-18F, together with the F-35A, clearly opens up opportunities for advanced crewed–autonomous teaming with platforms such as the Ghost Bat and places Australia in a good position to consider a sixth-generation future force with advanced, high-performance crewed aircraft, standoff weapons, autonomous systems and space capabilities at its heart.
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/t...ignMonitor&utm_term=The Super Hornet flies on
 
The Australian Government will purchase 20 new C-130J Hercules aircraft for the Royal Australian Air Force for $9.8 billion. This will provide the Air Force with state of the art C-130 Hercules to meet the air transport needs of the future.

The new acquisitions will replace and expand upon the 12 Hercules aircraft currently operated by Air Force with delivery of the first aircraft expected from late 2027.

There will be significant benefits for Australian industry from the expanded fleet size, with opportunities to construct facilities and infrastructure and to sustain the aircraft.

The Australian Defence Force relies on the C-130J Hercules aircraft for the deployment of personnel, equipment and humanitarian supplies. The iconic aircraft is regularly used in search and rescue missions, disaster relief and medical evacuation.

The C-130J has been involved in almost every major Defence operation in recent decades, from Bougainville assistance and Timor-Leste peacekeeping through to conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. More recently the aircraft supported Australia’s response to COVID-19 in the region, delivering vaccines and medical supplies, as well bushfire and flood response.

The C-130J Hercules are made by Lockheed Martin and are being purchased from the United States. The aircraft will continue to be operated by No. 37 Squadron at RAAF Base Richmond in NSW.
1690281428845.png

https://www.minister.defence.gov.au...ollar-investment-new-c-130j-hercules-aircraft
 
🇦🇺Australian Navy considering reducing the number of Type 26/Hunter class frigates (9 originally planned).

Looking at cheaper light frigate/corvette options - Type 31/Arrowhead 140 is a frontrunner possibly built in a joint programme with 🇳🇿New Zealand.

In photos: Type 26 (Hunter Class Variant) and Type 31/Arrowhead 140

 
an8561500_0006.jpg.iieI36_XMTOLu5NjYBMA.cwSctS-K3u.jpg

Defence Minister Richard Marles will soon receive a report from Admiral William Hilarides on the future of the Royal Australian Navy’s surface fleet. The additional analysis was initiated by the authors of the defence strategic review. They recommended that the future surface combatant force be split into tiers, with Tier 2 comprising a larger number of smaller vessels than those in Tier 1. ‘Tiers’ defines nothing; it simply compares one to another in relative terms. Navies don’t fight in tiers; they fight in task groups where the combined capabilities of different ships and systems are integrated into a mutually supporting combat force.

As Rowan Moffitt has noted, Paul Dibb’s 1986 Review of Australia’s defence capabilities also adopted the tier terminology and our underarmed Anzac-class frigates became our Tier 2 ships. In 1986 terms, the Arafura offshore patrol vessels would have been Tier 3. Moffitt also remarked that our Hobart-class air warfare destroyers and future Hunter-class frigates, which the defence strategic review called Tier 1, would be Tier 2 in comparable regional navies.

Kim Beazley lamented that while he wanted 17 surface combatants in the 1987 defence white paper, the peace dividend intervened and he achieved eight. Peace dividends have long been ephemeral. If we had achieved 17 surface combatants in service, history shows that only four or five would have been on task continuously. Now, the RAN has 11 surface combatants.

We know the as yet unbuilt Hunter frigate program is not in the best of health. There are still important unanswered questions about how a rank outsider became the favoured choice even though the Department of Defence received clear warnings about the risk in the RAND study it contracted. It’s clear that the ship is seriously underarmed and underpowered for its size and therefore poorly suited to operations in our region. The Royal Navy, which owns the original design, may well be satisfied, but that’s not sufficient reason for Australia to persevere in constructing a ship already known to have many shortcomings in how we need to operate them.

There’s no shortage of free advice from those wanting to sell us ships. We’ve seen media commentary on Luerssen’s efforts, and previously Navantia’s. Salespeople help you solve a problem, if you acknowledge and understand what the problem is. Otherwise, you end up where we are now, with a frigate program we don’t really want and a fleet of lightly armed Anzac frigates that will be about 37 years old when they retire. That’s an extraordinary age.

In our part of the world, combat ships are still essential to attack the enemy while defending themselves and protecting the ships carrying the vast quantities of logistics a fight requires. Where we live, combat operations will be largely at sea whether we like it or not. That’s why all other navies in our region are muscling up, while we’re going the other way.

Whatever decision the minister makes will axiomatically provide the RAN with operational advantages or disadvantages, and therefore facilitate or constrain government options in future circumstances we must hedge against, but which are entirely unpredictable in time and scale.

Deciding on Australia going to war, what our strategic objectives are and what a future peace should be are always profound responsibilities held by the government. If Australia’s military lacks flexibility or balance, political options desired by the government may not exist.

What advice on surface combatants should the minister anticipate from the professionals to help him understand the implications of the choices he must put before government? Here are suggested questions:

  • What limitations with our current fleet must be overcome?
  • What is the concept for operations for the fleet as part of the joint (and coalition) force, or, in the extreme, on its own—all of the fleet or just some of it?
  • What current and future threats must we defeat and how will we be equipped to do that? Hiding at sea is becoming more difficult. We can expect to be found. How will we disrupt an adversary’s surveillance efforts?
  • What are our tactics to integrate targeting arrangements for our aircraft and ships for anti-ship and land-attack missile strikes?
  • Are the command and control capabilities in each type of ship we have, or might have, able to deal with gigabytes of intelligence and other information?
  • Can they be fully networked with our air and surface forces and compatible with coalition partners?
  • Can they all conduct cooperative missile engagements in both defence and attack? What is their real endurance—will their crew sizes and onboard supplies let them operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week for weeks on end?
  • How will they be replenished with fuel, ammunition and food while on long operations, potentially far from bases and alone?
  • Will all our ships be able to operate effectively in the sea states and climatic conditions we encounter? How survivable will they be against missile attack?
  • How does the proposed force structure stack up against what we already have in our Hobart-class frigates that we know are among the best? (Although they are not as heavily armed as US, Korean or Japanese ships.)
  • It’s a missile game, so why aren’t we looking for ships that carry more of them—for defence and attack?
  • Will they all be capable of the standards we currently achieve or better?
  • Will all these ships be credible in a potential coalition force conducting high-end operations in our vast area of military interest?
  • What operations will not be possible because our ships are not good enough?
Then there’s the people question. People are the critical difference between having a useable navy and something else. For many years, there’s been a pea and thimble trick going on with how many people the RAN needs to keep its ships at sea. Fortunately, for decades many ships have been unavailable while in major upgrade programs that have made the people problem manageable.

In the face of ill-conceived efficiency reviews, the navy has done very well with what it has had to contend with. The defence strategic review recognised current workforce challenges but didn’t see that the RAN had ceased to be sustainable long ago. That’s what happens when accountants treat trained and skilled people as an expense, and not as an asset.

The Hunters will use the Anzac crews, and the OPVs are taking crews from the Armidale patrol boats. The navy’s ships have crews with many different specialisations. They are only produced by the navy and each can only be in one place at a time.

Funding is tight. Having different classes of ships with different equipment is inevitably more expensive. Given that there seems little possibility of building Tier 1 Arleigh Burke destroyers, the most cost-effective solution is to redirect expenditure already planned for the Hunters and standardise on surface combatants already in the navy’s inventory—the Hobart class. The workforce, technical and other risks ought to be manageable, and this can be a basis for crucial continuous shipbuilding. In concert, the navy can start to put in place measures to minimise fleet ownership costs using Australian industry.

Adelaide’s shipbuilder might need assistance to change from the Hunter frigate to a different ship. But this is taxpayers’ money.

The RAN sits in the long shadow of its recent history where, since 1987, serious planning for its future has been missing. This must be fixed. A 30-year plan is necessary with real milestones and real outcomes in building ships appropriate for Australia.

Value for money includes combat power, which ought to be the most important discriminator, and that’s what Australia needs.

David Shackleton is a retired vice admiral and former chief of the Royal Australian Navy.
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/t...he future of the RANs surface combatant force
 
Australia sends equipment to military exercises Super Garuda Shield 2023. For the first time since the Vietnam War, Australia sent tanks and armored vehicles abroad to the joint military exercises Super Garuda Shield 2023 with the United States in Indonesia. As reported, the equipment will be involved in the exercises next week. The exercises in Indonesia will be held from 31 August to 13 September. They will be attended by 125 troops from Australia, M1A1 tanks, armored personnel carriers, trucks and tow trucks. The exercise will allow the Australian armed forces to conduct training and work out interaction with partner countries to effectively deploy significant ground forces, including armored vehicles, across the Indo-Pacific region.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The Duke of Gloucester's Cup winners for 2023 - 2RAR

Leader board.
2RAR
8/9RAR
3RAR
6RAR & 5RAR
1RAR
7RAR

Gurkha Trophy - 1RAR - Section with the best over all combat shooting results.
Royal Australian Regiment Foundation Trophy - 1RAR - Section with the best endurance.
Sir Arthur MacDonald Cup - 1RAR - Section that best applied foundation warfighting skills.
Royal Ulster Rifles Trophy - 2RAR. - Section who performed best in the urban environment.

Individual awards from the DOG Cup.
DSM Roche CSC Memorial Cup – 2 RAR PTE Cattanack - Best individual soldier.
Albert Jakka VC Award – 8/9 RAR LCPL Hill - Best Section 2IC.
RSM’s Trophy – 2 RAR CPL Price - Best Section Commander.

The regular Infantry battalions of the Royal Australian Regiment compete against each other for the Gloucester Cup in an annual military skills competition. To compete for the Gloucester Cup, each infantry battalion sends a team to the Lone Pine Barracks at Singleton. These teams participate in a five-day competition demonstrating their training and endurance, from which the winning battalion is determined. First held in 1947 between the Australian battalions then in Japan as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force, the inaugural cup was awarded to 67th Australian Infantry Battalion (now the 3rd Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment). Between 1951 and 1971 the competition was not held due to operational commitments. Competition recommenced on a regular basis between 1972 and 1998; however, was again ceased as a result of operations in East Timor. The competition recommenced in 2003.

Royal Australian Regiment recipient of the Duke of Gloucester Cup

Year earnedWinner
194667th Bn
194767th Bn
19483 RAR
19493 RAR
19503 RAR
19746 RAR
19756 RAR
19765/7 RAR
19775/7 RAR
19786 RAR
19796 RAR
19812/4 RAR
19826 RAR
19838/9 RAR
19846 RAR
19856 RAR
19861 RAR
19871 RAR
19883 RAR
19898/9 RAR
19901 RAR
19916 RAR
19926 RAR
19932/4 RAR
19941 RAR
19953 RAR
19962 RAR
19971 RAR
19983 RAR
19991 RAR
20031 RAR
20041 RAR
20051 RAR
20072 RAR
20086 RAR
20092 RAR
20103 RAR
20113 RAR
20122 RAR
20132 RAR
20146 RAR
20151 RAR
20163 RAR
20172 RAR
20186 RAR
20192 RAR
2020Not held
2021Not held
20223 RAR
20232 RAR
 
New Zealand’s Defence Ministry has issued a request for information to replace nearly the entire naval fleet, which currently includes nine ships in six different classes.

The Royal New Zealand Navy’s flagship — its 568-foot replenishment vessel HMNZS Aotearoa — has been in service for three years, but the remaining eight ships — two frigates, two inshore and two offshore patrol vessels, a sealift ship, and a dive and hydrographic ship — will reach the end of their service lives in the mid-2030s.
1695443175901.png

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2...new-ships-to-replace-majority-of-naval-fleet/
 
The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) will be deploying six F-35A Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft to Indonesia for the first time, as part of Exercise Elang AUSINDO 23.

Held at Manado in North Sulawesi from 18 to 28 September 23, Exercise Elang AUSINDO 23 involves 150 RAAF personnel training alongside 160 Indonesian personnel. The Indonesian Air Force will deploy F-16 fighter aircraft for the air combat mission.

Air Vice-Marshal Glen Braz, Air Commander Australia, said the exercise marks the first time Australia has deployed the F-35A to Indonesia.

“Exercise Elang AUSINDO is a regular combined training activity to increase our capacity to work together,” Air Vice-Marshal Braz said.

“Through this exercise we can build mutual cooperation, trust and understanding, both at the aviator-level and more broadly between the Australian Defence Force and Indonesian National Armed Forces.

“We are fully committed to a strong bilateral partnership with Indonesia; this important exercise allows our air forces to develop deeper relationships and enhance cooperation.”

Exercise Elang AUSINDO 23 will see Australian and Indonesian personnel plan and execute air combat exercise missions including offensive and defensive counter air missions; basic fighter manoeuvres and air combat manoeuvres and air-to-air refuelling with a RAAF KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transport.

First held in 1993, Exercise Elang AUISINDO is part of a series of air cooperation exercises with Indonesia that includes Albatross AUSINDO (for maritime surveillance) and Rajawali AUSINDO (for tactical airlift).
https://www.defence.gov.au/news-eve...gthen-defence-ties-during-air-combat-exercise
 

Major changes to Army announced​


28 SEPTEMBER 2023

The Government has outlined key changes to Army’s units and formations – as well as changes to equipment locations – to boost capabilities, preparedness and projection.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the changes were in response to recommendations of the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) to maintain peace, security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.
“Our Army has always played a vital role in the defence of our nation and will continue to do so as it adapts to the challenges of our times,” Mr Marles said.
“These changes involve some hard decisions. But these decisions are necessary to build the Army Australia needs.
“This will mean Army has a concentration of people and capabilities in Australia’s north, making it easier to deploy for training, major exercises, or to support our partners and allies in the region.”
The DSR signals a shift from having a defence force with a broad range of capabilities to a more focused force directed to maintaining peace and security in the region.
Accordingly, Army is being restructured to moving from generalist combat brigades to specialist combat brigades.
1st Brigade will be light, agile and quick to deploy in the littoral environment.
3rd Brigade will be an armoured brigade designed for amphibious operations with the Royal Australian Navy in order to secure decisive terrain.
7th Brigade will be motorised and optimised to project by air and sea to respond to regional contingencies.
In summary:
  • The 1st Brigade, based in Darwin, will be a light combat brigade.
  • The 3rd Brigade, based in Townsville, will be an armoured combat brigade.
  • The 7th Brigade, based in Brisbane, will be a motorised combat brigade.
  • The 10th Brigade, based in Adelaide, will be raised as a fires brigade.
The 5th Battalion and the 7th Battalion will be relinked to become 5th/7th Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment, and will be based in Darwin.
The 1st Armoured Regiment will be re-roled as an experimental unit to deliver and integrate emerging technologies. This will remain in Adelaide.

To minimise the impact of the changes on soldiers and their families, Army will not move personnel between regions outside of the normal posting cycles.
Personnel from 7th Battalion and 1st Armoured Regiment will post to new locations as their planned postings end, or earlier if they choose. This means most personnel will be posting in the December 2024 and January 2025 period.
Acting Chief of Army Major General Richard Vagg said supporting personnel and their families would be central in Army’s approach to implementing the changes.
“The change is about organising Army to train as we would fight and making the most of the resources we have been assigned,” Major General Vagg said.
“These changes will deliver world-class, relevant and credible combat capabilities that are focused and optimised for operating in the littoral environments of our region, on land, at sea and in the air.
“Our aim is to limit the disruption to our people and their families as we make these important changes. Our people are our Army and I thank each and every one for your service and commitment to adapting our Army.”
The 2nd (Australian) Division – the division that commands all security and response brigades in Australia – will maintain largely part-time brigades around Australia. The Regional Force Surveillance Group will remain focused on security in northern Australia.
Army Aviation and Special Operations Commands will continue on their current modernisation pathways.
Army’s presence in Western Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and NSW will be largely unaffected by the changes.

Changes to Army equipment locations:

Townsville
will become the home of armoured vehicles and army attack and medium-lift aviation. Army’s presence in Townsville will grow as a result.
Brisbane will be home to a motorised combat brigade with a focus on the ability to uplift and move personnel.
Darwin will see minor changes to the combat brigade, with a focus on light forces that are agile and quick to move. The number of Army personnel posted to Darwin will remain steady over time.
Adelaide will become future-focused, where key future long-range strike capabilities will be consolidated:
  • Accelerated and expanded long-range strike (HIMARS) and integrated air and missile Defence capabilities (NASAMS) will be based in Adelaide.
  • The number of full-time personnel in Adelaide will decrease over the short term. Numbers are expected to return to current levels from 2028.
 
End of the line for the MRH-90. All permanently grounded which will leave a bit of a gap in ADF capabilities until more UH-60's come into service.


200.gif


What a shit show of a project that was, from start to finish.
 
New Zealand should grab them all like we did with your Seasprites.
 

Major changes to Army announced​


28 SEPTEMBER 2023

The Government has outlined key changes to Army’s units and formations – as well as changes to equipment locations – to boost capabilities, preparedness and projection.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the changes were in response to recommendations of the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) to maintain peace, security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.
“Our Army has always played a vital role in the defence of our nation and will continue to do so as it adapts to the challenges of our times,” Mr Marles said.
“These changes involve some hard decisions. But these decisions are necessary to build the Army Australia needs.
“This will mean Army has a concentration of people and capabilities in Australia’s north, making it easier to deploy for training, major exercises, or to support our partners and allies in the region.”
The DSR signals a shift from having a defence force with a broad range of capabilities to a more focused force directed to maintaining peace and security in the region.
Accordingly, Army is being restructured to moving from generalist combat brigades to specialist combat brigades.
1st Brigade will be light, agile and quick to deploy in the littoral environment.
3rd Brigade will be an armoured brigade designed for amphibious operations with the Royal Australian Navy in order to secure decisive terrain.
7th Brigade will be motorised and optimised to project by air and sea to respond to regional contingencies.
In summary:
  • The 1st Brigade, based in Darwin, will be a light combat brigade.
  • The 3rd Brigade, based in Townsville, will be an armoured combat brigade.
  • The 7th Brigade, based in Brisbane, will be a motorised combat brigade.
  • The 10th Brigade, based in Adelaide, will be raised as a fires brigade.
The 5th Battalion and the 7th Battalion will be relinked to become 5th/7th Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment, and will be based in Darwin.
The 1st Armoured Regiment will be re-roled as an experimental unit to deliver and integrate emerging technologies. This will remain in Adelaide.

To minimise the impact of the changes on soldiers and their families, Army will not move personnel between regions outside of the normal posting cycles.
Personnel from 7th Battalion and 1st Armoured Regiment will post to new locations as their planned postings end, or earlier if they choose. This means most personnel will be posting in the December 2024 and January 2025 period.
Acting Chief of Army Major General Richard Vagg said supporting personnel and their families would be central in Army’s approach to implementing the changes.
“The change is about organising Army to train as we would fight and making the most of the resources we have been assigned,” Major General Vagg said.
“These changes will deliver world-class, relevant and credible combat capabilities that are focused and optimised for operating in the littoral environments of our region, on land, at sea and in the air.
“Our aim is to limit the disruption to our people and their families as we make these important changes. Our people are our Army and I thank each and every one for your service and commitment to adapting our Army.”
The 2nd (Australian) Division – the division that commands all security and response brigades in Australia – will maintain largely part-time brigades around Australia. The Regional Force Surveillance Group will remain focused on security in northern Australia.
Army Aviation and Special Operations Commands will continue on their current modernisation pathways.
Army’s presence in Western Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and NSW will be largely unaffected by the changes.

Changes to Army equipment locations:

Townsville
will become the home of armoured vehicles and army attack and medium-lift aviation. Army’s presence in Townsville will grow as a result.
Brisbane will be home to a motorised combat brigade with a focus on the ability to uplift and move personnel.
Darwin will see minor changes to the combat brigade, with a focus on light forces that are agile and quick to move. The number of Army personnel posted to Darwin will remain steady over time.
Adelaide will become future-focused, where key future long-range strike capabilities will be consolidated:
  • Accelerated and expanded long-range strike (HIMARS) and integrated air and missile Defence capabilities (NASAMS) will be based in Adelaide.
  • The number of full-time personnel in Adelaide will decrease over the short term. Numbers are expected to return to current levels from 2028.
IMHO robbing Peter to pay Paul, cannabalising current capability to create a new one. Instead of trying to bulk up our forces they're just shrinking and dispersing what we have. I am a believer in gaining extended range missiles but cutting armour to the bone is not the way to do it, again IMHO
 
New Zealand should grab them all like we did with your Seasprites.
Or we should just suck it up and follow suit. The NZDF is too used to making things work and giving the false impression of a maintainable capability. The NH90 looked good on paper but its overall design comes up short when compared to the Blackhawk as a tactical troop transport. The later euro designed helo's in the class have adopted designs more in line with the Blackhawk i.e. larger troop doors and separate gunner/crew stations.
 
IMHO robbing Peter to pay Paul, cannabalising current capability to create a new one. Instead of trying to bulk up our forces they're just shrinking and dispersing what we have. I am a believer in gaining extended range missiles but cutting armour to the bone is not the way to do it, again IMHO

They're not on their own though, we've pretty much copied the USMC.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top