It's hard for me to comment on what Tucker said since I don't watch regularly anymore. But I will try to catch his monologues on YT, though. I generally do agree with Tucker about 90%, however.
Well, to reply in a tongue-in-cheek kind of way, it wasn't hard for you to comment that all which Tucker Carlson does is arguing against purported attempts of the hawks to drag America into a war with Russia. I'd suggest it's more than that.
And I don't think Putin would have attacked had the US had stronger leaders. I'm sure he was left astounded by the shear incompetence Team Biden showed in Afghanistan.
You've reiterated this opinion a couple of times, and I attempted as many times to entice you into sharing your view on the ideological underpinnings of this war (which Putin and his state-run news agency did deliver to us in quite explicite a manner). Allow me to press you for your opinion once more, because I genuinely cannot see how you'd arrive at such a conclusion. No offence, but what you're saying strikes me as reminiscent of when most people believed that Hitler hadn't meant anything specific by the ideas he laid out in 'Mein Kampf'.
By the way, before anyone gets their knickers in a twist – I'm not comparing Putin to Hitler. (Quite yet.)
How do you think Putin could've publicly expressed such views and politicaly survive not acting upon them?
As far as the US trying to sort itself out. It is. But I'd want you to think of it like this. In the US there is a large faction who still believe in liberty and don't want to be ruled by overlords. Call them Globalists, Elites, whatever you want. I submit to you that other places, Europe for example, have already surrendered to them. Nothing to sort out over there.
You may very well accuse me of ignorance on American matters, but I'd have to return the favour with regard to your view on Europe. It's a bit of a different system over here. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those idiots who think that our crap smacks of roses. It doesn't. However, continental societies are more pluralistic than yours, and the power of corporations or interest groups is evidently limited (at least in direct comparison). There's no Hollywood promoting its ideology, bids for presidency don't depend on big donors, and you don't have to be a millionaire to become a measly parliamentarian. At any rate, I wasn't trying to instigate a systemic debate.
Maybe you feel this war isn't as relevant to America, which would be somewhat understandable given the geographic distance and the growing popularity of quasi-isolationism in America ever since the 2010s'. But having experienced the last decade of the Cold War, and being eternally grateful for the role which America played in ending it, I find it incredible to see that American news shows from both sides mainly revolve around dissecting the past rather than asking questions about the future. Like what this war means for America, or how it could be ended. In fact, I feel like even now, many Americans dwell more on threats posed by nobodies like Iran.
Childish ?
Well, it was childish from Germans to execute my grandmothers brother on the spot and from grandfathers side send some family members to Dachau "holiday" camp.
Only for new generation to hand over country to new Germany this time wielding with the wallet instead of gun.
That's me done with the topic on Germany from my side (f.ck them).
May I ask where you're from? I mean, if you mean to hate Germany for evils which someone who wasn't me inflicted on someone that wasn't you, I at the very least would like to know which place it is that Germany is allegedly now ruling through the force of money. I sure hope it's not a NATO country, that would make that clause about mutual defence awkward.
Good Chechens, or bad Chechens, they all look the same to me……
The bad Chechens are the ones who've somehow managed to forget all that shyte about blood feuds, honour and faith and now fight to support a people's right to secede (which they themselves were denied) under the banner of a president whose forces killed at least 65,000 of their countrymen (according to Russian claims).
See, what you're missing is that this clusterfvck wouldn't have had to happen. It's just an accumulation of poor leadership decisions and weakness which allowed Putin to even consider invading Ukraine. He figured, now's the time. Team Biden is feckless and inept. The EU is toothless. I'll do what I please, no one will stop me. Once you reach the point where 200K troops are massed on Ukraine's border, you've already failed.
Poor leadership and unilateral disarmament made it easier for Putin, that's very true. Was it a sine qua non to
enable him, though? As mentioned before, I see no evidence for that. Nor do I see how you would've had Western leaders stop Putin without risking the very escalation to which you're opposed.
After the Afghan withdrawal, and Bidens let’s say simplistic approach, plus European 40 years of taking the gas and turning a cheek, why would putin think anything else?
Even putin is like wtf…
I think you're overestimating the role of the Afghanistan withdrawal. The Soviets actually fared far worse than NATO at every step of the turn, which is (presumably) why even Russian state television didn't devote nearly as much attention to the debacle at Kabul as it could've. With 14,500 deaths one does not easily gloat over NATO's 3,500 deaths.
But, more importantly, the West's unwillingness to waste another twenty years in that hell-hole didn't tell Putin anything he'd not already known.
I think I've said it about a dozen times in this thread: Stop Buying Putin's Oil And Gas. That's the only thing that will hurt him.
True. Although there's headlines like this:
India, which imports 80 per cent of its oil needs, usually buys only about 1 per cent from Russia. But following price increases, New Delhi is looking at how it can reduce its energy bill.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Just because we're not buying, doesn't mean nobody else is. There's actually a chance that the next time Russia butts heads with the West, they're in a far better position to do so. Imagine a Russia that doesn't rely on trade with the West in order to run its economy. You'd have to sanction all their allies as well, and that's just not possible. On that I wholly agree with an earlier assessment of yours, that China is the main benefactor of this war.
I wonder if Putin even realises this.