- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
- Messages
- 6,225
- Points
- 258
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94d5f/94d5f9c82ade2341678c6318748647014793cb62" alt="United Kingdom United-Kingdom"
Of course, we would not. We are not as unethical and immoral as the U.S. administration. We donated much more to Ukraine than the U.S.A. in terms of the GDP percentage. On top of that, we stripped our first-line combat units off equipment unlike the U.S.A. who mostly sent its reserve equipment.Well under who's duress. So US can keep allied with EU/UK . Looking at Polands interest for Ukraine to sign that is the main theme. I wonder if Poland would sign its minerals away...I think not
Poland donated more tanks to Ukraine that all the remaining donors combined.
They were not as good as Leopard 2A6s or M1A1s, but they came in a big number at a time and the Ukrainians didn't have to learn how to operate them. You know, it's more beneficial to form 12 tank battalions that consist of the same type of tanks you are familiar with, and you have a lot of spare parts for these tanks, rather than you attach 5 better tanks to a tank battalion that has totally different tanks. These better tanks spread over many battalions won't influence the battlefield very much.
These 360 Polish tanks were the reason the Ukrainian Kharkiv offensive in 2022 was successful.