Mil News Current Iran/Iraq/US Tensions and Actions Unfolding

[BCNTM]

Prefixed with 'Bottom of' if they try and use it on the yanks...

It will make a nice reef to dive at some point

 

[Mike1976]

Persian Gulf is not a great name for a tanker

Still better than "Wreck site 3971a through n"

It will make a nice reef to dive at some point

No, because war grave.

 

[Ivan le Fou]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[BCNTM]

Biden to reverse Trump’s Muslim ban on inauguration day

Memo by Biden’s incoming chief of staff showed that the president-elect is looking to reverse several Trump policies.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[Ivan le Fou]

*Though it wasn't a Muslim ban to begin with...*

 

[Mardonius]

*Thgouh it wasn't a Muslim ban to begin with...*

Sure thing honey.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iran is upping the ante. Good for them.

 

[Ivan le Fou]

The last thing the world needs is medieval mullahs with WMDs.

And no, it was NOT a Muslim ban.

Executive Order 13769, aka Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States. But politically labeled "Muslim ban" by detractors.
Executive Order 13769 lowered the number of refugees to be admitted into the United States in 2017 to 50,000, suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days, suspended the entry of Syrian refugees indefinitely, directed some cabinet secretaries to suspend entry of those whose countries do not meet adjudication standards under U.S. immigration law for 90 days, and included exceptions on a case-by-case basis.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lists these countries as Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

In short to to lower the risk of Islamist terrorism.

By calling it "Muslim ban" you are effectively calling every Muslims terrorists. You included.


Gonna have to cry a bit harder than that, "honey".

 

[Mardonius]

The last thing the world needs is medieval mullahs with WMDs.

What are you prepared to do?

And no, it was NOT a Muslim ban.

Executive Order 13769, aka Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States. But politically labeled "Muslim ban" by detractors.
Executive Order 13769 lowered the number of refugees to be admitted into the United States in 2017 to 50,000, suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days, suspended the entry of Syrian refugees indefinitely, directed some cabinet secretaries to suspend entry of those whose countries do not meet adjudication standards under U.S. immigration law for 90 days, and included exceptions on a case-by-case basis.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lists these countries as Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

In short to to lower the risk of Islamist terrorism.

By calling it "Muslim ban" you are effectively calling every Muslims terrorists. You included.

Gonna have to cry a bit harder than that, "honey".

They can spin it as much as they can; it was a muslim ban by all definition and Trump's own words.

 

[Fluff]

Sure thing honey.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iran is upping the ante. Good for them.

of course it depends on where you view it from.

Sitting here, its an early mention that Iran needs to behave itself, or the relatively non-aggressive members of the club are going to get upset with Iran. How do you think the aggressive members will view it?

 

[Mardonius]

of course it depends on where you view it from.

Sitting here, its an early mention that Iran needs to behave itself, or the relatively non-aggressive members of the club are going to get upset with Iran. How do you think the aggressive members will view it?

The same aggressive members that have allowed Iran to become a nuclear threshold state? Despite all the tools they have used to try to stop, slow or frustrate Iran from advancing its nuclear program, the reality is that the country is still moving forward.

 

[BeNder]

The same aggressive members that have allowed Iran to become a nuclear threshold state? Despite all the tools they have used to try to stop, slow or frustrate Iran from advancing its nuclear program, the reality is that the country is still moving forward.

Do you live in iran? If not, you should slow your roll. Why do you not live in iran? You seem all about iran. why?

 

[Mardonius]

Do you live in iran? If not, you should slow your roll. Why do you not live in iran? You seem all about iran. why?

Nothing you should worry about.

 

[Fluff]

The same aggressive members that have allowed Iran to become a nuclear threshold state? Despite all the tools they have used to try to stop, slow or frustrate Iran from advancing its nuclear program, the reality is that the country is still moving forward.

But thats against the agreement- which Iran accepted. Sounds like a silly thing to do, and silly to broadcast that you are doing it.

 

[BCNTM]

The same aggressive members that have allowed Iran to become a nuclear threshold state? Despite all the tools they have used to try to stop, slow or frustrate Iran from advancing its nuclear program, the reality is that the country is still moving forward.

Moving backwards to the 6C AD - if it's so great when you moving back? - I need someone to go and pickup some bulbs for me

 

[Mardonius]

But thats against the agreement- which Iran accepted. Sounds like a silly thing to do, and silly to broadcast that you are doing it.

That's bit hilarious, mate.

It was the US that torn down the agreement while the other European signatories didn't abide by their obligations as well. Can't expect Iran to live up to the terms while the other parties are violating it.

 

[BCNTM]

Do you live in iran? If not, you should slow your roll. Why do you not live in iran? You seem all about iran. why?

No *ex and drugs and rock and roll in Iran any more - not since that awfully nice Shah

Nuclear fallout is not good for your complexion either

 

[Mardonius]

No *ex and drugs and rock and roll in Iran any more

Ha! If you would only know...

 

[BCNTM]

But thats against the agreement- which Iran accepted. Sounds like a silly thing to do, and silly to broadcast that you are doing it.

Like painting a big target on your forehead

 

[BeNder]

Nothing you should worry about.

If you think that your country will dominate the ME then you are confused. Our allies (Israel included) will put a hurt on you. Do you think that you can shoot a few mod scuds and get away with it? You are deluded.

 

[Fluff]

That's bit hilarious, mate.

It was the US that torn down the agreement while the other European signatories didn't abide by their obligations as well. Can't expect Iran to live up to the terms while the other parties are violating it.

Everyone had different reasons, US mainly so they could if they chose take military action. The point I would make, is that there are several players that will not allow Iran to create nuclear weapons. Such actions that could/will be taken, will impact Iran. They wont impact main street USA. For sure Iran could then try and throw a tantrum, but as discussed previously, missiles in bunkers, high speed boats, are easy kills for the sorts of weapons USA has. Iran is playing with fire.