Politics Wokism/Woke/World gone crazy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordoror
  • Start date Start date
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And Lucasfilms has plenty of retroactively-repugnant racial stereotypes in their old blockbusters to be pilloried/cancelled over.

The axe swings both ways, hopefully.
It never does. Jimmy "Blackface" Kimmel still is the left's darling, as is Canada's Justin Trudeau.

I've been following this whole debacle with growing amusement, though. Earlier this week, news emerged that merchandise for Carano's Cara Dune is as popular as products for the lead Mando himself, in some product categories (like those shitty action figures) even more popular. Disney promptly pulled the plug and had Amazon terminate sales of the stuff. Now people trade the stuff via ebay way above retail prices.

It's just so hilarious: They had one of those strong female characters they keep yammering about, one whom fans seemed to be genuinely interested in and care about; a cash cow true and true, at a cut-price no less considering Carano made about 25,000 bucks per episode. Isn't that something they kept whinging about: That men don't like strong female characters? Apparently they do.

Oh boy … when even a dirtbag like Dana White goes "She shouldn't have said those things but firing her was a douche move", you know you've done fᴜcked up.

?
 
When the wokery backfires ...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Remember when Trump said, back in 2017 or something, that the next step in taking down statues would be to take down statues of Lincoln, Jefferson, Washington, etc?

Remember when people laughed at him and called him a moron for making such claims?

Yeah...
 
One of the more bizarre woke accidents in recent memory comes courtesy of the Dᴜᴅᴇɴ, Germany's equivalent to the Oxꜰᴏʀᴅ Eɴɢʟɪsʜ Dɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ. Until 1996, its editors used to have the power to bindingly determine the rules of German grammar; but for all intents and purposes it still is the official German dictionary, remaining in use by government and people alike.

Now, you may or may not know German uses the generic masculine. There aren't many English nouns with which to easily illustrate this practice, but one would be: 'actor'. In German, an 'actor' could mean both a male and female. Gender-appropriate declension ('actress') became a thing only a few decades ago. ('Actress' denotes only a defined individual, though: That random woman over there is an 'actor', Gal Gadot over here is (allegedly) an 'actress'.)

German feminists have been pestering the public to ditch the generic masculine altogether. (Obviously, the grammatical genus has nothing to do with biological gender but try explaining that to a feminist.) So, unlike in English where e.g. a female cop would insist on being called 'officer' rather than 'policewoman' it's the other way around: They want "their" nouns.

And wouldn't you know it, the Dᴜᴅᴇɴ recently caved in to the pressure and extended the official German vocabulary by a mind-numbing 10,000 nouns. They've added a female counterpart of every noun, as if the declined one wasn't merely a variant of the generic masculine but a word in its own right (it isn't). They also reworked the generic masculina to incorrectly state they only define males: For example,

someone who engages in the acting profession

became

a male person who engages in the acting profession.

So far, so boring. However, not only has this reform been drawing the ire of the "excluded" trans-community, it's also created the amusing situation that the quasi-official dictionary of the German language is now brimming with glaring mistakes revealing the error of their ways. That's because those bumbling morons forgot to double-check their bloody sample sentences.

For instance, the definition of 'supplier' (Lieferant) used to be:

a person or organisation which delivers a good.

Now, the definition goes as this:

a male person who delivers a good.

And the sample sentence underneath reads:

This company is our supplier for spare parts.

Spot the mistake? Just insert the definition given above:

This company is our male person who delivers a good for spare parts.

So far, folks have spotted more than 500 mistakes like this. ?‍♂️
 
I just had a clash on twitter with an american SJW.
Let me tell you this straight. You guys are all doomed. I think even arguing with Navalny's children online you can have a more intelligible conversation than whatever I just went through.
 
I just had a clash on twitter with an american SJW.
Let me tell you this straight. You guys are all doomed. I think even arguing with Navalny's children online you can have a more intelligible conversation than whatever I just went through.
probably one of my relatives... can you post some excerpts of the conversation?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ben Shapiro sat down with Gina Carano on Sunday and the two had an interesting conversation. Now, obviously, the rule of hearsay still applies here but what Carano alleges about the practices over at Disney is not only shocking but also plausible. For instance, after her "offensive" tweets they wanted her to appear before what can only be described as a Zoom-tribunal with dozens of people and admit to the error of her ways.

It kind of reminds me of what the Chinese or the Soviets used to do. Every now and again, the farmers and labourers working the collectives would have to gather together and come forward with their transgressions against the cause only to be derided by the audience. This "cleansing experience" was supposed to improve their ideological steadfastness and work output.

I think she' left a positive impression here. She's certainly not a radical; if anything, she's a bit naive. I'd even go so far as to suggest she and her detractors have more in common than they'd admit, as Carano too seems like someone who forms her political beliefs based on raw emotions. Anyway, I'm glad she's come forward. Her interview is now trending on Youtube in most of the world's territories, and it doesn't make Hollywood look good at all.
 
One of the more bizarre woke accidents in recent memory comes courtesy of the Dᴜᴅᴇɴ, Germany's equivalent to the Oxꜰᴏʀᴅ Eɴɢʟɪsʜ Dɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ. Until 1996, its editors used to have the power to bindingly determine the rules of German grammar; but for all intents and purposes it still is the official German dictionary, remaining in use by government and people alike.

Now, you may or may not know German uses the generic masculine. There aren't many English nouns with which to easily illustrate this practice, but one would be: 'actor'. In German, an 'actor' could mean both a male and female. Gender-appropriate declension ('actress') became a thing only a few decades ago. ('Actress' denotes only a defined individual, though: That random woman over there is an 'actor', Gal Gadot over here is (allegedly) an 'actress'.)

German feminists have been pestering the public to ditch the generic masculine altogether. (Obviously, the grammatical genus has nothing to do with biological gender but try explaining that to a feminist.) So, unlike in English where e.g. a female cop would insist on being called 'officer' rather than 'policewoman' it's the other way around: They want "their" nouns.

And wouldn't you know it, the Dᴜᴅᴇɴ recently caved in to the pressure and extended the official German vocabulary by a mind-numbing 10,000 nouns. They've added a female counterpart of every noun, as if the declined one wasn't merely a variant of the generic masculine but a word in its own right (it isn't). They also reworked the generic masculina to incorrectly state they only define males: For example,



became



So far, so boring. However, not only has this reform been drawing the ire of the "excluded" trans-community, it's also created the amusing situation that the quasi-official dictionary of the German language is now brimming with glaring mistakes revealing the error of their ways. That's because those bumbling morons forgot to double-check their bloody sample sentences.

For instance, the definition of 'supplier' (Lieferant) used to be:



Now, the definition goes as this:



And the sample sentence underneath reads:



Spot the mistake? Just insert the definition given above:



So far, folks have spotted more than 500 mistakes like this. ?‍♂️
I know very little German, but enough to basically look over a paper, book, or article and determine where I need to sit down and start doing some serous translation to get the information that I need or want. Looking at this, if anyone follows these rules, I'm screwed if I try to read any article written since this crap came up. Also, my almost non-existent German just became 100% non-existent German.
 
Speaking of so-called gender-appropriate nouns in German, I was delighted to read in today's annual report of the parliamentary ombudsman of the German armed forces that "lots" of female German soldiers petitioned against rumored plans to change rank designations into something more "inclusive" (e.g. 'airman' into 'airwoman').

Even the ombudsman – who is a bloody left-winger herself – couldn't help but notice those women in uniform cherished military traditions and suggested that perhaps the next time this debate pops up someone should bother and ask female soldiers for their opinion first. I cackled a little, not gonna lie.

@JimHPTN

Indeed, and it makes learning the language way more difficult. Heck, even for native speakers it can be quite annoying and confusing when every subject appears as a duplicate (legal texts in particular are a nightmare to read).

Here is what would be grammatically correct:

Militaryimages.net gefällt den deutschen Benutzern gut.
German users enjoy militaryimages.net.

Here is what newspeak demands:

Militaryimages.net gefällt den deutschen Benutzerinnen und Benutzern gut.
Female and male German users enjoy militaryimages.net.

Note that this way nouns are also robbed of their informative value. For instance, if I were to say (in a grammatically correct manner) a school has 500 pupils – die Schule hat 500 Schüler – this would convey the information to the reader that 500 children regardless of gender attend said school.

However, the left's gender-appropriate speech – die Schule hat 500 Schülerinnen und Schüler – fails to render females distinguishable as intended (!). That sentence could mean anything from 1 girl and 499 boys attending said school all the way up to 499 girls and 1 boy.

It's rubbish. It's made-up. And no one except the left seems to care.

In fact, I've met many women in my professional life who liked the idea of being referred to with a generic masculine for a job title. Apparently understanding their native language way better than the politicians and intellectuals professing to speak in their name, they said a female-specific job titles makes it sound like they're not the "real thing".

Ironically, that's quite correct in historical terms. When the first female doctors and lawyers entered the job market a century ago, the men insisted they be referred to with a female job designation suggesting their allegedly inferior quality.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ben Shapiro sat down with Gina Carano on Sunday and the two had an interesting conversation. Now, obviously, the rule of hearsay still applies here but what Carano alleges about the practices over at Disney is not only shocking but also plausible. For instance, after her "offensive" tweets they wanted her to appear before what can only be described as a Zoom-tribunal with dozens of people and admit to the error of her ways.

It kind of reminds me of what the Chinese or the Soviets used to do. Every now and again, the farmers and labourers working the collectives would have to gather together and come forward with their transgressions against the cause only to be derided by the audience. This "cleansing experience" was supposed to improve their ideological steadfastness and work output.

I think she' left a positive impression here. She's certainly not a radical; if anything, she's a bit naive. I'd even go so far as to suggest she and her detractors have more in common than they'd admit, as Carano too seems like someone who forms her political beliefs based on raw emotions. Anyway, I'm glad she's come forward. Her interview is now trending on Youtube in most of the world's territories, and it doesn't make Hollywood look good at all.
The Shapiro/Carano long-form podcast probably has more value as a milestone/indicator of the future of news media & social commentary than it does for Carano in particular.

Long-form podcasting is the format that is least vulnerable to digital platform cancel culture as well as soundbite snipers In traditional media.

Long-form podcast distribution cannot be disrupted due to the endless number of podcast search engine feeds.

Ayatollah Khomeini was known and heard everywhere in the Shah’s Iran in the 70’s despite being in exile in France and legitimate fear of SAVAK torture, all via copied cassette tapes.

Joe Rogan & Tulsi Gabbard(now with her own long-form podcasting effort) would be a bigger milestone/indicator of this trend.

Podcasting could be the big weapon for 2022/2024 much as email, social media, and Cambridge Analytica data analysis were all milestones that relate to new, social commentary, and politics.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

HAHAHAHAHAH
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

AngryCop's sister's take in the end: "I'm not going to ask the army to change something for me because I'm female". Bless her. Good God, leftists are annoying. The worst part is, they're not even bitching about things to which one could concede: You're exaggerating but alright, I can see how that could be an issue under certain circumstances.

No, they literally have to make things up. Even worse, they don't know they're making things up because they don't know crap anyway. I bet that broad has no first-hand experience whatsoever and is just repeating "facts" she picked up in the Huffington Post from some feminist harpy who couldn't be arsed to inform themselves either.
 
Here homework has been banned.. causes anxiety.
 
Here homework has been banned.. causes anxiety.
Banning homework has caused anxiety as well....... in parents..... spose that doesnt matter to the powers that be though.
 

Being fed up with government and then calling them incompetent and uneducated is now a hate campaign.

With the last government name calling was just a good topic for a funny article. ( last government was called among others: SSS-men, pigs, macho-government)

The 2019 study found that the right got at least as much hate mail as the left.
I don't doubt a metric ton of abuse is coming their way on a daily basis and quite frankly, I think it's shocking an ever-increasing number of people seem to think politicians should just put up with all the shyte flung at them. Having said that, the inflationary use of the word "hatred" nowadays is indeed annoying and dangerous.

And I sincerely doubt large chunks of society actually care about the fact they're women. I'm getting tired of all that "glass ceiling"-nonsense. Fourty years after Thatcher, a female prime minister is nothing special in any Western country, nor does being one require extraordinary courage. If anything, ordinary folks are getting sick of the de-facto re-emergence of gender as a requirement for a government position.

On a related note, if you're forced to piece together a government from five different parties, how are you representative of society anyhow. This gives the smaller parties a disproportional amount of power. Anything beyond a two-party coalition government is madness and ought to be shunned as far as I'm concerned – if not downright discouraged by the constitution.
 
Biden Harris calling the sex addict shooting a racial hate crime. Biden gets on a camera licks his dry lips and and lies there is too much hate in America and its caused Asians to be fearful, full well knowing its him who caused it by saying it was a hate crime.
Its a 180 from when they'd never or reluctantly call a Muslim terror killing a hate crime.
Sad to see the US in control of such slime buckets.
 
Turkey abandons its signature to the UN convention for stopping violence against women...created in Istanbul.
Instantly stirring up eastern Europe countries with collective remembered history of Turkish rule.
At-least it caused protest in Istanbul.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top