Yes but it also bought Germany time to continue to rearm, to absorb the weapons taken from Czechoslovakia and Austria (and Austrian manpower). The tradeoff may not have been a positive one.
Exactly.
Hate to be that guy, but Neville Chamberlain did have a chance to stymie Hitler and blew it.
Nazi Germany was in no shape to fight a two-front war in 1939 and the
Wehrmacht knew it well. Army Commander-in-Chief Colonel General Walther von Brauchitsch, Chief-of-Staff Colonel General Franz Halder and Military Intelligence chief Admiral Wilhelm Canaris were anxious enough to embark on a conspiracy eventually dubbed the September Plot: They meant to arrest Hitler and kill him, should he try to go to war over Czechoslovakia (which the conpirators were sure would lead to a Franco-British counter attack).
Then came the Munich Agreement, Hitler was suddenly seen as a man of peace and his popularity rose to such heights that the conspirators felt they had to give up for lack of popular support. From Ian Kershaw's book 'Hitler 1936-1945': "The conspirators, who had hoped to use Hitler's military adventurism as an argument to depose him, no longer saw an opportunity to strike." And Major General Hans Oster, deputy head of the
Abwehr (later executed for his involvement in the July Plot of 1944) wrote in his diary: "Chamberlain has saved Hitler".
Appeasement is always a bad idea. Well, Chamberlain could be forgiven insofar as totalitarianism was a new phenomenon back then. It's different today. Scholz, Biden and other so called leaders flirting with appeasing Putin should know better.