I'm confused. Sure also because CNN actually more or less corrected some of their shoddy conspiracy theory reporting, but more specifically because they first mention the Haqqani network as being the source of the attack and then go on to state multiple times that Taliban fighters carried it out. But they're not the same, and they don't really go together well, even more so because the Taliban has far more to gain by peace at this point than by carrying out an attack no matter how big. Long term gains vs short term posturing.
Funny how they say that no concrete actions were taken after the attack. Well except for taking out the head terrorist and several of his underlings in various locations but that's only good if Obama does it while taking out a few dozen family members in the process as "reasonable collateral"