- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
- Messages
- 4,106
- Points
- 234
A follow-up to yesterday's post; I should've had known there was more to the Berlin court's decision than was initially reported on. The context decides what makes a defamation and what doesn't.
According to the news around here, the context was that Kuenast had been presented with a parliamentary point of order by another opposition lawmaker during a speech she was giving, wherein he inquired whether or not she'd signed a petition in 1986 that demanded pedophilia be decriminalized. To which she'd replied: "As long as no violence would be committed." (As though a five-year-old boy would volunteer to have sex with an adult. Good God.)
That's what'd stirred the defendant's anger. So, yeah, she is a disgusting cᴜnt.
?
According to the news around here, the context was that Kuenast had been presented with a parliamentary point of order by another opposition lawmaker during a speech she was giving, wherein he inquired whether or not she'd signed a petition in 1986 that demanded pedophilia be decriminalized. To which she'd replied: "As long as no violence would be committed." (As though a five-year-old boy would volunteer to have sex with an adult. Good God.)
That's what'd stirred the defendant's anger. So, yeah, she is a disgusting cᴜnt.
They should read Heinrich Heine instead: "Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings."
?