• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you
Sunday May 23, Fleet Base East, Sydney
_nc_ohc=E8Hd2u9L_QIAX9hamE-&_nc_ht=scontent-syd2-1.webp
X9FppdS&tn=Qog6WJ6llxg0sw7z&_nc_ht=scontent-syd2-1.webp
_nc_ohc=HB8fJf6zvtMAX_4CLnn&_nc_ht=scontent-syd2-1.webp
_nc_ohc=Dw2WqpZoSzkAX8AwH-U&_nc_ht=scontent-syd2-1.webp
 
Rheinmetall is pleased to announce the delivery of the first 25 Boxer 8×8 Combat Reconnaissance Vehicles (CRV) to the Australian Army (Australian Defence Forces) under the $5.2 billion LAND 400 Phase 2 Mounted Combat Reconnaissance Capability project.

Rheinmetall_Boxer-CRV_01_311_k-1200x731.webp
Rheinmetall-Boxer-CRV-Outback-1-1160x1160.webp
Rheinmetall-Boxer-CRV-Outback-3-1160x1160.webp
 
Is the Army still looking at dropping the 7.62 Rifle and Minimi within Infantry sections? I remember it was a course of action they were looking at a few years back.
 
I'm sure I just saw something on a new 7.62 DM rifle.
 
Is the Army still looking at dropping the 7.62 Rifle and Minimi within Infantry sections? I remember it was a course of action they were looking at a few years back.
It was one per section when I left in 2015. Could've changed though.
 
I'm sure I just saw something on a new 7.62 DM rifle.
I can't remember where I read it but in an ADF/Army article from a couple years back it mentioned with the adoption of the EF88 and an enhanced 62gr projectile there would no longer be the requirement for 7.62mm weapons at section level. I also seem to remember talk of removing belt feds in general at section level. Could have just been the great ideas club at work again though.
 
Ex Arnhem Thunder
47b136969629bcb3819437755fb5415a6223e39a0c57b49d00.webp
69dcbaa254ef10e1bbd8733f55858d330794d6650ba9f45ce1.webp
d896ae6370befcdac9a41b281cff34e85a17245f2734569da6.webp
a848ba12d89cca853afda567ecfe0fb1b29732e9d8eaea67e8.webp
ae8d6f9dbc24c33c9e52d348d0e738c02890788ffdec44b1e9.webp
 

Attachments

  • 47b136969629bcb3819437755fb5415a6223e39a0c57b49d00.webp
    47b136969629bcb3819437755fb5415a6223e39a0c57b49d00.webp
    28.2 KB · Views: 156
  • ae8d6f9dbc24c33c9e52d348d0e738c02890788ffdec44b1e9.webp
    ae8d6f9dbc24c33c9e52d348d0e738c02890788ffdec44b1e9.webp
    24.5 KB · Views: 170
  • a848ba12d89cca853afda567ecfe0fb1b29732e9d8eaea67e8.webp
    a848ba12d89cca853afda567ecfe0fb1b29732e9d8eaea67e8.webp
    57.1 KB · Views: 153
  • d896ae6370befcdac9a41b281cff34e85a17245f2734569da6.webp
    d896ae6370befcdac9a41b281cff34e85a17245f2734569da6.webp
    55.8 KB · Views: 141
  • 69dcbaa254ef10e1bbd8733f55858d330794d6650ba9f45ce1.webp
    69dcbaa254ef10e1bbd8733f55858d330794d6650ba9f45ce1.webp
    16.8 KB · Views: 161
I can't remember where I read it but in an ADF/Army article from a couple years back it mentioned with the adoption of the EF88 and an enhanced 62gr projectile there would no longer be the requirement for 7.62mm weapons at section level. I also seem to remember talk of removing belt feds in general at section level. Could have just been the great ideas club at work again though.

I reckon tranche 2 of Land 159 has all 3 types of machine guns covered, LMG, MMG and HMG. Where they employ them, is another story all together. With 3, 6 and 7 having 30mm cannons sooner rather than later and 1, 5 and 8/9 having what ever they can strap on a CROWs mount on a PMV, maybe they start thinking they don't need dismount belt fed weapons. I fear that would only last until the first contact though.
I don't think they've even nailed down section sizes yet, is it 6 in the back and 3 crewies, or are they squashing 8 in and the crew?
 
I reckon tranche 2 of Land 159 has all 3 types of machine guns covered, LMG, MMG and HMG. Where they employ them, is another story all together. With 3, 6 and 7 having 30mm cannons sooner rather than later and 1, 5 and 8/9 having what ever they can strap on a CROWs mount on a PMV, maybe they start thinking they don't need dismount belt fed weapons. I fear that would only last until the first contact though.
I don't think they've even nailed down section sizes yet, is it 6 in the back and 3 crewies, or are they squashing 8 in and the crew?
I haven't seen what the capability requirement is for the IFV for dismounts. That being said the KF41 version of the Lynx being trialed in phase 3 has seating for 8 dismounts and 3 crew vs 6 and 3 for the smaller KF31. Either way it will mean a change in org.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top