Our new PM, seems to have a difficulty with telling 'everyone' to behave. in his view, anyone misbehaving is 'Far-Right'. He then tacks onto each of the 3 speeches that he will protect Muslims and mosques. The point alot of british people are trying to make, is that they would like this 'special' level of protection, available to everyone, but especially 6 year old white girls.
in my opinion he should be saying:
Everyone needs to behave
All violent acts will be investigated and prosecuted
Get off the streets if you don't want to be arrested, and get your kids/young men off the streets
I told you in my election campaign, that we have a plan for immigration, and for crime, and I'm trying to get on with it.
The immigration issue, is that Blair let in millions, for reasons hard to fathom the conservatives continued this for 14 years, and just before the election the figures came out, and the conservatives were like 'how did that happen'.
But again for reasons not really explained, the treasury expects/plans for another 7M over the next 10 years. But we build about 1/3 of the homes this number would need. At the same time we have millions of people on sick benefits(not a great way to live).
And for the areas that are rioting, these are the 'below average' industrial cities, where your minimum wage job packing fishfingers could easily be taken by a recent arrival. So for these people they are 'scared' of immigrants taking their jobs.
And then on top of this, we have an issue not so much 'knife' crime, but machete waving crime, a lot to do with drugs, but a lot of the people are black, as are a lot of the victims, especially in London. Actual murder rate is fairly level, and by American standards miniscule, and slightly above Germany, which also has a 'mixed' population.
Add on the soft policing of the palestinian marches, in London, every week, and the airport incident where a policeman kicked a muslim in the head, mass condemnation from politicians, and then 2 weeks later we get the video of the muslim punching the police 20 times... and its easy to suggest 2 tier policing, which is then confirmed by the PM as only Muslims get 'special protection'.
I cant work out if starmer is trying to be strong, and deliberately winding up the white working class, of if he's stupid, and accidentally winding up the white working class.
Just follow the money trail usually... any state can put a stop to illegals and crime if they truly wanted to. However, how would that impact their activities, when people will start scrutinizing something else, like their economic policies?
We embrace capitalism, we are not owned by anyone. This is why we have managed to stay alive and thrive without help or support from any other nation.
The Philippines have always been important to America. They had no commerce and no way to make any money. In WWII under Japanese rule and even after the return of US forces the people were eating from garbage cans of the camps. By the way my step father was Filipino and Retired US Navy a second retirement with Data Process Corporation San Diego. His Father was a Sgt Major in the Philippine Army wartime. His brother was a graduate of the West Point of the Philippines and retired a 4 star general. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone from his era that would complain about US Involvement. You dislike America but don't know squat about us other than reading some Marxist BS.
We know exactly what the agenda of those illegals really are, they gather at a bill paying counter at walmart and citizens can't even pay their monthly bills because there are so many illegals wiring that US green back to their home in the southern hemisphere. We have good immigration laws that have been good for all that wish to come to America. Liberals do not obey their oaths to protect the laws and constitution regarding immigration. It is written no one shall be allowed citizenship unless they can write and speak English, we even send them to school to study so they can become citizens. Liberals want people who will willingly go to voting station and vote knowing full well they are not allowed to vote if they are not citizens. Yes we know the effects of illegals. The economy rules the cost of housing not an illegal. Today the economy is shattered by that Squid sleeping in the White House Oval Office
Nobody needs to own you, they just need you to follow and play by their rules.
- Your nutrition was dictated by the Agriculture industry and the corporations that run it
- Your medicines are controlled by big pharma, so much that people were praising Mark Cuban for bringing generic drugs to the US, when its been happening all over the world.
- Can you even do business as an entrep without being hounded by laws included as barriers to entry? Where's most of the mom and pops store you grew up with that hasnt been killed by walmart? The biggest employer in most of the red states too
- JP Morgan is about to spend $1 billion in buying up houses all over the US and I'm pretty sure it wont be good for the market.
- Ford is the reason for the 40 hour work week
- Your watches time are set on systems made by the railroad companies
- Heck the office coffee break was a Dunkin Donut marketing ploy.
Isnt that what lobbyists are for, to make sure the "politicians" listen to them more than you and I?
The only thing that is probably free and have not been influenced is the air that you breath... that will also probably change soon.
The US has thrived based on how smart and ruthless the government can be, not because of its general population. The population will follow what is being fed to them. Most of my point is what Trump has been saying in the so called draining the Swamp, it's just that he is part of that system and will give you the low baring fruit.
On the illegals, sending money. That's pretty much what all the immigrant groups have been doing since the US was formed. I would say there are more legal migrants that are sending far bigger amounts that most illegals can ever imagine. In fact more than an agenda, thats what most people would do who work hard... help their family locally or abroad. Could probably stop illegal migration for some once they get that money.
Now, wasnt it Ronald Reagan that gave amnesty to 3 million illegals back in 1986? Wasnt it also Bill Clinton in 1996 that passed the revised Immigration law, that made migration to the US so draconian;y strict? So which side wants illegals more? My opinion, would be the admin that needs them as a distraction when needed. No side is clean on this one.
FYI... and no the immigration laws passed by Good Ole Bill was very draconian for legal immigrants. It isnt as good as you think it is for those who wish to come to the US legally. I lived through it.
I'm going to ignore the "you hate the US" part, as that simply how these forums go to hell. Just as a backgrounder, legal immigrant to the US, mom is an American citizen and step dad served the US well, model student and would say more highly indoctrinated by the US government than your average American student back then. By that I mean, was placed in Advanced Placement US History, Civil Air Patrol Cadet, had an uncle that was a Commodore in the US Navy, had a Congressman willing to endorse me for one of the service academies, etc. When I say "the United States sends its sons to die in distant lands, it isnt for Freedom or Democracy, its for an American interest there" thats me parroting a US Air Force Colonel talking to us, or when I say "Trust none of what you hear and only half of what you are seeing" thats a US Navy intelligence personel talking to us.
Sorry for the long post and probably shitty grammar and spelling, its 1am and I'm still sober.