- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
- Messages
- 1,539
- Points
- 169
Allah Akba,ALAB
Photos Afghan Armed Forces (Prior to 2021)
- Thread starter BravoZulu
- Start date
-
- Tags
- afghanistan taliban
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,419
- Points
- 338
Talks of leaving started under Trump.
Too bad you are leaving the important and relevant part about the agreement being "conditional". Unlike Joe's unconditional withdrawal.
Here, read:
Considering all the concessions Joe did to China, and Russia, that one isn't that big of a stretch.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 2,681
- Points
- 278
Ok if you say so Ivan. However, these guys says otherwise:
www.axios.com
Also, did you even read and understand the PDF you posted? It was the US governments deal with the Taliban. So under Trump they already recognize it was the Taliban who would rule Afghanistan.
Even before the announcement it was already being mentioned here that it will be China that will be the most likely ally of the Taliban.
Trump officials back away from 2020 Taliban peace deal after withdrawal chaos
"Our secretary of state signed a surrender agreement with the Taliban."
www.axios.com
Also, did you even read and understand the PDF you posted? It was the US governments deal with the Taliban. So under Trump they already recognize it was the Taliban who would rule Afghanistan.
Even before the announcement it was already being mentioned here that it will be China that will be the most likely ally of the Taliban.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 2,681
- Points
- 278
So now the China man, just got access to more American gear and training, this also gives the TAlibs access to some spare parts and ensuring that their "armed forces" will be well supplied. So either the Northern alliance gets going or they are doomed.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,419
- Points
- 338
Ok if you say so Ivan. However, these guys says otherwise:
Trump officials back away from 2020 Taliban peace deal after withdrawal chaos
"Our secretary of state signed a surrender agreement with the Taliban."
Also, did you even read and understand the PDF you posted? It was the US governments deal with the Taliban. So under Trump they already recognize it was the Taliban who would rule Afghanistan.
Even before the announcement it was already being mentioned here that it will be China that will be the most likely ally of the Taliban.
Read the thing bruh. And also your own article while you are at it.
The thing, not just the title. The little things below the title. Read it bruh.
Literally point 3 bruh...
After the announcement of guarantees for a complete withdrawal of foreign forces and timeline
in the presence of international witnesses, and guarantees and the announcement in the presence
of international witnesses that Afghan soil will not be used against the security of the United
States and its allies, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United
States as a state and is known as the Taliban will start intra-Afghan negotiations with Afghan
sides on March 10, 2020, which corresponds to Rajab 15, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar calendar and
Hoot 20, 1398 on the Hijri Solar calendar.
Don't stick the title.
Also the US gear is documented being heading toward Iran. Try to keep up with the news.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,419
- Points
- 338
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 2,681
- Points
- 278
I think you are the one stuck on reading the headlines, actually read the whole article and get a good grasp of the whole picture. In that entire document, America was basically saying who will lead Afghanistan. Somehow the Americans got it, you didnt.
PART 2:
When the agreement mentions the Taliban not giving out passports etc to individiuals or orgs that may harm the US and its allies.... guess what does that imply?
This part is actually trying to secure a peace "promise" from the Taliban that there would be no further attack to the US.... again what does that imply?
Part 3: is the US being a Pontius Pilate and washing his hands that once they are out, they wash their hands what happens after... they saw the writing on the wall
You use that agreement to think positive of Trump, when upon reading it, its basically America bitching out.
As for your mention about weapons going to Iran, did you really read the articles? Cause if you did, the equipment that Iran got, came from an Afghan unit that crossed to Iran, and was double crossed. Not something that came from the Taliban. You actually talked about reading beyond the headlines... once again you are a joke.
PART 2:
When the agreement mentions the Taliban not giving out passports etc to individiuals or orgs that may harm the US and its allies.... guess what does that imply?
This part is actually trying to secure a peace "promise" from the Taliban that there would be no further attack to the US.... again what does that imply?
Part 3: is the US being a Pontius Pilate and washing his hands that once they are out, they wash their hands what happens after... they saw the writing on the wall
You use that agreement to think positive of Trump, when upon reading it, its basically America bitching out.
As for your mention about weapons going to Iran, did you really read the articles? Cause if you did, the equipment that Iran got, came from an Afghan unit that crossed to Iran, and was double crossed. Not something that came from the Taliban. You actually talked about reading beyond the headlines... once again you are a joke.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,419
- Points
- 338
Nope.
From A to Z. Including my views on Trump (not the first time you would have done that now, wouldn't you?).
Basically providing an in-retrospect, incorrect overview of a document. Call it, armchair-generaling or monday-quarterbacking.
Aint going to educate a gaslighter.
As for the gear: US gave gear to ANA, ANA gave up, Taleb took gear, Taleb gave gear to Iran.
Not from Afghan units.
Your timeline does not even fit.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,419
- Points
- 338
Afghan evacuation raises concerns about child trafficking
U.S. officials are looking into reports that in the frantic evacuation of desperate Afghans from Kabul, older men were admitted together with young girls they claimed as “brides” or otherwise sexually abused.
apnews.com
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
- Messages
- 7,380
- Points
- 293
Afghan evacuation raises concerns about child trafficking
U.S. officials are looking into reports that in the frantic evacuation of desperate Afghans from Kabul, older men were admitted together with young girls they claimed as “brides” or otherwise sexually abused.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
- Messages
- 6,132
- Points
- 258
Young girls presented as wives of older men, a problem as US processes Afghan refugees
U.S. officials at intake centers in the United Arab Emirates and at Fort McCoy in Wisconsin have identified numerous incidents in which young Afghan girls have been presented to authorities as the "wives" of much older men.
Afghan evacuation raises concerns about child trafficking
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. officials are looking into reports that in the frantic evacuation of desperate Afghans from Kabul, older men were admitted together with young girls they claimed as
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2020
- Messages
- 6,141
- Points
- 309
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 677
- Points
- 148
Apparently some celebratory gunfire over the taliban internal mssgs that they've won in the panjshir resistance dust up. Never believe anything they put in their little private newsletter. But best to get under some thick concrete or steel when all those bullets come back down. You would think they got all that ammo for free. They are going to issue a new reg making shooting in the air a crime.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2020
- Messages
- 6,141
- Points
- 309
Taliban leaders claimed control of Panjshir valley in Afghanistan, as per reports. Resistance leaders denied the claim and said the fight between Taliban and resistance forces is ongoing, as per reports. Resistance leader Amrullah Saleh claimed that he has not left from Panjshir amid reports of him fleeing from the valley. Saleh termed the reports as baseless and said the forces are resisting. This comes at a time when Taliban is all set to form government in Afghanistan.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2020
- Messages
- 6,141
- Points
- 309
Three people were killed as the result of indiscriminate firing on the occasion of the Panjshir victory.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 677
- Points
- 148
Hear around 6+ with serious head wounds from errant gunfire in downtown.......& the lights are out at Ariana Medical Complex. Lots of power out all over. This city will be out of doctors, gas & food in another week. & it's probably going to be 6 months of good behavior before anyone sets in a humanitarian mission. It's going to be a tuff long winter for these poor folks.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2020
- Messages
- 6,141
- Points
- 309
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 677
- Points
- 148
That's a start but a worry the taliban with feed themselves well 1st & then start selling it to people that can't afford it.
Similar threads
