Great. Is that just military contributions, or does that include direct cash to fund Ukraine's government, payroll, pensions and other?
Honestly, it's hard to say how much the US has contributed. I was counting along month after month and felt it was roughly $200 billion. Zelensky says he's only seen $100 billion. Trump says it was $300 billion. Those numbers certainly are not the way they are due to rounding differences.
I support a full audit to get to the bottom of it.
The graph shows the grand total of military and humanitarian aid, both in goods and funds.
Military aid in goods is valued by a function based on what governments said their donations are worth, corrected for original prices, inflation, and what looks to me like a flat deduction for age.
The US has given more military aid in goods than Europe. It'll be difficult to substitute—provided Trump still means to supply goods that would need substituting—but far from impossible, and the gap is shrinking.
The conflict has reached a point where aid in goods is not as important as it used to be, at least as long as the US (and Europe, too) refuse delivery of further modern MBTs and long-range effectors. The Ukrainians have achieved autarchy in terms of most munitions, drones, and self propelled howitzers.
There are three major items of the "previously approved for delivery"-category which Europe can't fully substitute so far, and that's Patriot interceptors, ATACMS missiles and holistic intelligence packages.
There's only one Patriot producer in Europe (MBDA in Germany); expansion is underway, but production is capped to about 20 a month until their new factory is finished (2028).
ATACMS is, obviously, out of production, and no compatible replacement exists in Europe.
And as far as intelligence goes, well, there's a reason the NSA is seen as the most potent intelligence agency in the world. France, Germany and the UK operate 31 military satellites between them, compared to 247 operated by the US.