Warfare HAMAS attack on Israel, Oct 2023 & Iran’s Proxies.
- Thread starter Musashi
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,318
- Points
- 248
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,546
- Points
- 338
Hamas has announced that they will be suspending the hostage release deal, stating that they won’t release the hostages that were set to be returned to Israel on February 15.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu consulted with top security officials, and decided to move the security cabinet meeting to earlier on Tuesday, with it now being scheduled to take place at 11:00 a.m. local time.
Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz, stated that he instructed the IDF to maintain maximum readiness for “any scenario in Gaza” and to “protect communities.” "We will not return to the reality of October 7," he added.
Additionally, the IDF has cancelled all leave and vacations for active troops within the “Gaza Division,” while all its member personnel are being ordered to return to active duty.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu consulted with top security officials, and decided to move the security cabinet meeting to earlier on Tuesday, with it now being scheduled to take place at 11:00 a.m. local time.
Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz, stated that he instructed the IDF to maintain maximum readiness for “any scenario in Gaza” and to “protect communities.” "We will not return to the reality of October 7," he added.
Additionally, the IDF has cancelled all leave and vacations for active troops within the “Gaza Division,” while all its member personnel are being ordered to return to active duty.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,546
- Points
- 338
The amount of news organization and morons who can't be bothered to understand simple words and sentences is staggeringly high.
Even if Trump states things clearly, corrects the "journalists" from making incorrect inferences, they still find a way to push the smooth-brained BS because they just hate the guy. And, incidentally, they also hate Israel.
But I assume it is par for the course when you also simp for Ukrainian neo-nazis...
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,318
- Points
- 248
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,546
- Points
- 338
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,318
- Points
- 248
The beginning of the end.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
- Messages
- 7,554
- Points
- 293
NSW Health nurses stood down over 'vile, dehumanising' comments in video
Two NSW Health nurses have been stood down after video emerged which show them bragging about killing and refusing to treat Israeli patients.
www.abc.net.au
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,546
- Points
- 338
A question to our Israeli and IDF servicemen members, if you can answer of course:
-What are your views on the Hannibal Directive?
-What are the views of the Israeli people on it?
-What are your views on the Hannibal Directive?
-What are the views of the Israeli people on it?
Jordanian lawyers were protesting obsorbing another influx of Palestinians, lawyers whom relly on precedence to argue their point are literally proving an oxymoron case. Nearly 1/2 of them are Palestinians within Jordan not including those of mixed heritage.
Egypt use to own the village of Gaza and fought for it.
But now nobody wants them all the way to the local judiciary. This should be testament enough for the woke likes of AOC and our own variant Chloe Swarbrick to stop and shut up.
Egypt use to own the village of Gaza and fought for it.
But now nobody wants them all the way to the local judiciary. This should be testament enough for the woke likes of AOC and our own variant Chloe Swarbrick to stop and shut up.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,318
- Points
- 248
It always was considered very problematic, but necessary evil kind of thing. It basically made sense, especially in the military context.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Messages
- 13,546
- Points
- 338
From what I got so far, even by asking other people who worked in the "defense sector" in Israel, is, though problematic as you said, the directive remains, regardless, very "curtailed" in term of use.
Though it relies on a number of hypothesis, it is mostly based on "what is the likeliness we (IDF) will manage to get our men and citizens back before anything happens to them".
Considering the experience Israel has with its citizens being taken hostages by terrorist organizations, how Islamic terror groups treat their hostages, and how Israeli hostages are especially prized "commodities" the approach is "better die now in a rather clean way, or as quick as possible, than ending up being the protagonist of some snuff movie on liveleak".
Had it existed back then, I wonder if it would have been used in Munich and Entebbe.
But, more to the core of my question: is it accepted equally as "dying in service" by service members?
Regarding civilians, I would assume they would expect for their lives to be spared by their own government, though they would be likely to be at the receiving end of barbarous treatments. Which Israel is, understandably from a Historical point of view, very, let's say, "touchy" about.
A report by the Wall Street Journal shows Israel may be planning major strikes on Iran's nuclear sites this year, seeking potential US backing under the Trump administration.
www.jpost.com
Israel considers striking Iranian nuclear sites - report
A report by the Wall Street Journal shows Israel may be planning major strikes on Iran's nuclear sites this year, seeking potential US backing under the Trump administration.
www.jpost.com
Similar threads
