Make up your mind! You're upset if the US leaves Syria and you're upset if the US stays in Syria. LOL!
I don't know what it is that you don't understand? The US does not want ISIS, Iran, Syria, Russia, etc., to profit from the oil. The US has no issue with the Kurds profiting from the oil. Simple as that.
I am not angry for anything. Sorry if my posts are looking like that.
The issue is that your policy is not consistent in the time....
You leave the kurds to be bombed because there is only sand, endless war, bring the boys back(tm)
Then, no redeploy in Irak so no boys back
Then redeploy and possibly send more around oil fields so finaly there something else than sand
To sum it up, your administration abandonned ground allies to be slaughtered by Turkey backed AQ offsets and other fundamentalist groups you are supposed to fight under the GWOT
5 days later your administration 'makes up its mind' and tryti settle a ceasefire that gives the agressors everything they want, justifying might is right.
Then your boys are redeployed in Irak (so what is the difference to have them stay where they were before again, 150 km maybe ?. They are still on hot zone anyway)
And you 'secure' oil fields with a parr of these soldiers that were supposed to be back home. Still inside Syria. Fields that dont belong to USA but to the Syrian Arab Republic as long as the country no matter , how despicable is the regime, is still recognized in his international borders.
In order to have oil exploited by US companies for the benefit of god knows who, you are putting soldiers at heavy risk for oil, the same soldiers that were supposed to come home, oil that in any case doesnt belong to you and on which you have no right at all.
Your administration on this one is coming down as backstabbing, oil greedy, liar
As i said, wonderful propaganda tool given on a plate to anybody (from small political tools to nations) who would want to oppose you.
You will see this Potus45 action rear its head more than once in the coming years
There are always consequences, even if delayed, when you play foul on international policy.
You were warned about this for the Kosovo 99, GW2 2003, intervention in Syria outside any legal demand and int law in 2014. This is another premisse in the book of your competitors that will be used in a "whatabout, USA did it, why not us" way