advertise with MilitaryImages.Net

Politics Roe Vrs Wade Overturned

Euroamerican said:
The unborn baby killing and fetal cell harvesting was already a business, and the cross-border option for those who still want to have abortions will generate new forms of that business. There are already people on my FB feed talking of providing transportation from Idaho to Oregon, or providing room and board within Oregon for any birthing person wishing to wash that baby right out of their hair....
Click to expand...

Hysterical reaction from headless hens.

But it is barely surprising and, to some extent, the grotesque of these reactions is almost hilarious.
 
surfpunk said:
apparently people are rioting here in my town.... no one told these dimwits, that abortion is not illegal, its just the states' right to decide, rather than the federal. as it should be.
Click to expand...

Emotional brainlets being emotional.


They have found their new "current thing" to get behind. They will drop their Ukraine flag on their twitter identifiers and replace it with something else.
 
Last edited:
We're going to find out tonight how well protected a lot of Catholic churches and other conservative churches are.

Unfortunately, a lot will not be well protected.

But TRY THAT during a service at a few of them, and they are going to find out there are a few nasty dogs hiding in the flock.
 
Euroamerican said:
We're going to find out tonight how well protected a lot of Catholic churches and other conservative churches are.

Unfortunately, a lot will not be well protected.

But TRY THAT during a service at a few of them, and they are going to find out there are a few nasty dogs hiding in the flock.
Click to expand...

The protection will likely come from the inside, and not from authorities.
 
surfpunk said:
apparently people are rioting here in my town.... no one told these dimwits, that abortion is not illegal, its just the states' right to decide, rather than the federal. as it should be.
Click to expand...
A "mostly peaceful" new flat screen TV or other electronics group acquisition. If you see anybody in the news clips running with a toaster, they be illegal immigrants from Russia!
 
Ivan le Fou said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ah well, looks like it is insurrectin' time?
Click to expand...
This is cruel premeditated attack on the very heart of American democracy. The terrorists must be punished.
 
Euroamerican said:
We're going to find out tonight how well protected a lot of Catholic churches and other conservative churches are.

Unfortunately, a lot will not be well protected.

But TRY THAT during a service at a few of them, and they are going to find out there are a few nasty dogs hiding in the flock.
Click to expand...
The Protestant churches will be much better off than the Catholic churches. In many Protestant churches a lot of the congregants carry firearms. Most Catholic churches have schools attached and therefore the congregants can't carry firearms.
 
Euroamerican said:
Sure would be nice!

Maybe those 10,000 or so people streaming across the southern border will suddenly not wan5 to come here anymore!
Click to expand...
*Orders shish kebab for no apparent reason*

16427743_1817385915191654_5498706863254602579_n.jpg
 
Even the Pentagon is telling the Supreme Court to gtfo?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Damn, that Administration does really care about the Constitution and the Rule of Law.
 
The signaling spreads to NZ. TV news ..... pro abortion woman creates petition to cancel a National MP for tweeting approval of US decision.
Taxcindy started barking aswell..hoping to save the election. Unfortunately for her the National party opposition leader Luxton who privately supports birthing has already stated he isn't after a law change to ban it here.
 
Some say condoms have 91% chance to prevent pregnancy. I thought everything stays behind the rubber, so how is this possible? Maybe the saliva contains small amounts of semen, should I be worried?
 
Man, what can I say but Kudos. Tucker has come a long way from his days as a bow tie wearing manlet and has gone full-on-no-fvcks-given sigma chad:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

One of the few people to even recognise the real economic impetus behind all this, let alone speak up about it.

EDIT: Always a pleasure to watch the left make utter fools of themselves in public. Can't wait for those midterms.
 
"Gone is the empathy or the room for compromise".

Well, yes, but no.

Because there was neither empathy nor compromise to begin with.


Dems are unhinged, hysterical morons.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
It's an interesting ruling as Roe vs. Wade being over ruled might then be a precedent for Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird to also be over ruled. Those last two is more to the legality of contraceptives. As all these decisions were made on the the basis of the Right of Privacy in the household/marriage.

In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court ruled that a state's ban on the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy.

Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples.

The Supreme Court overruled Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on the grounds that the right to abortion was not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history or tradition", and was not considered a right when the Due Process Clause was ratified in 1868, and was unknown in U.S. law until Roe.

The bold part is for me the most interesting part as thet will definitely be used in other cases:
- Griswol v. Connecticut: contraceptives
- Lawrence v. Texas: Butt stuff
- Kennedy v. Lousiana: pedobears

Would be interesting how this unfolds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
military advertising
Back
Top