Politics Is it any surprise Epstein Kills himself

Jussie Smolett wants you to know he is not suicidal.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

He respects the judge's decision and the jury.

And he is not suicidal.

You must all know that.

He is not suicidal.

He is NOT suicidal.
 
Jussie Smolett wants you to know he is not suicidal.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

He respects the judge's decision and the jury.

And he is not suicidal.

You must all know that.

He is not suicidal.

He is NOT suicidal.
I am beginning to think someone thinks he is suicidal...?
 
Now I look back on it, this thread was strangely quiet when Prince Andrew was a dirty child f**ker.
 
Jussie Smolett wants you to know he is not suicidal.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

He respects the judge's decision and the jury.

And he is not suicidal.

You must all know that.

He is not suicidal.

He is NOT suicidal.
Didn't know he was that deeply involved with the Clintons.
 
Some good news regarding the Maxwell trial and the following "revelation" that one of the jurors might/may have perjured himself during the jury-selection process.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The juror in question answered by the negative to the question "have you ever been victim of any sexual crime/abuse" (I'm paraphrasing) in the jury questionnaire (first phase of jury selection), but later said in an interview following the trial he (or she, can't remember, and I'm not a biologist) actually was a victim of sexual crime/abuse.

Which prompted Maxwell's defense to ask for a retrial due to the jury not being impartial.
 
Some good news regarding the Maxwell trial and the following "revelation" that one of the jurors might/may have perjured himself during the jury-selection process.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The juror in question answered by the negative to the question "have you ever been victim of any sexual crime/abuse" (I'm paraphrasing) in the jury questionnaire (first phase of jury selection), but later said in an interview following the trial he (or she, can't remember, and I'm not a biologist) actually was a victim of sexual crime/abuse.

Which prompted Maxwell's defense to ask for a retrial due to the jury not being impartial.
That 'judge' found her guilty before she set foot in the court

Clearly there is an issue with one or more of the jury, and it should go for a retrial - but it's America and convenient to have her banged away
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

still think there is more from all of this that should see the light of day, but perhaps never will...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Love how the media have been all like: "Trump is mentioned! Trump is mentioned! See? Trump!"

While, in fact, the only time Trump is mentioned is when a witness got asked about him, if she had seen him, talked to him, been in contact with him, etc... and the answers were consistently "no".
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
9ba25b5b1c9dd844f5fab343543a46b2c6af3f5ba89efec4b959b897de08a3dd.jpg

hawking.jpg
 

Similar threads

Back
Top