Support us at Patreon

Politics Climate Hysteria Debunked Yet Again ....

That kind of stock feed or what is known technically as deferred grazing/standing hay could have happily been consumed by the neigbouring stations/farms live-stock. Its the end of winter here. Wherein any source of that kind of feed is at a premium as otherwise it is replaced with expensive crops or stored hay or silage. Docs supposed to control the regrowth scrub and pines. There is not one source of fuel that was mitigated. Clearly no fire break provided.
Sage could have funded all of it by leasing back grazing if she was that short of funding. But the reality is she is short of brains.
 
There are numerous high fuel places added to this by the carbon credits scheme. Forests of pines planted and not to be harvested. Only growth for carbon credits. Land let go to waste. These owners are not going to be culpable for the risk they created? and I doubt if a fire occurs and the place burns down there is provision the the carbon credit scam wherein the loss of carbon gone into the air from the fire has to be paid back.
 
^Well, I guess the forest owners could always claim that it wasn't any fossil carbon they "produced". What went up in the air on their land had been taken out of the atmosphere before by the trees and was bound in the form of wood for some time. So it doesn't add to the total system.
 
They will have already received income for the carbon per tonne that was stored prior to the fire as a non-harvesting forest. So unless they have some insurance scheme pooling the risk of fire the land owner should be paying the carbon credit owners back their money. Its like the bank that's been robbed. And these fires as we have seen are next to uncontrollable in summer.
 
1602097624074.webp
 
Aussies PM Turnball was blocked from addressing UN's climate change after not announcing any timeline to limit gases. Taxcinder whom has destroyed NZ's oil industry and declared NZ would be zero carbon days before the meeting said she wasn't allowed enough time to speak so therefor declined to take part.
They criticized her for not implementing policies... amounting to giving money to their chosen countries, China and India where coal is burnt without penalty and taxing livestock farming.
 
Last edited:
Aljazeera believes the 92 % of excess emissions are created by Australia, US, Canada, UK, Europe excluding Balkans and Norway.

tG1YSCJ.jpg


Opec and China, Japan, India South East Asia despite their smog clouds escaped any suspicion.

The woke progressive leaders including Boris have been installed in the guilty countries banning combustion engines and rant about the year they will be zero carbon. Have to wonder how popular they will be when their fan base twigs onto the idea that they personally are the ones paying for the Paris accord's "global catastrophe".
 
Last edited:
I just noticed Boris's UK is excluded. Oh and Italy.
Filthy Finland???

92% huh.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Ivan le Fou said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...
teaspoon in a swimming pool again

this is what happens when you move all you're manufacturing to one country and expect them to meet environmental standards you can't meet yourself

Good to see Biden is as useless as Obama - is Hunter selling 'carbon-credits' yet :rolleyes:
 
That would not have happened with Hillary in charge for the past four years! :o
 
primer said:
The woke progressive leaders including Boris have been installed in the guilty countries banning combustion engines and rant about the year they will be zero carbon. Have to wonder how popular they will be when their fan base twigs onto the idea that they personally are the ones paying for the Paris accord's "global catastrophe".
Click to expand...

Most infuriating about this they start from the small fries and things that hinder normal life, instead of concentrating on biggest issues such as energy sector and heating.

And then you have greens in the government. They virtue signal 24/7, while in reality they were in governments throughout 90's and 00's blocking nuclear permits. Had they passed, Finland's emissions could be as much as third lower today. Then the government runs down use of peat, which lead to Finland importing wood chip from developing countries just to be burned. And their go to solution is wind power. These two last things mean that we have to import more electricity from clean sources, such as Russia. I'm sure they produce it without emissions.

These people keep talking about how it's a global problem, but seem to have least understanding of that fact.
 
While Russian Gas saves the EU from the wrath of Greta.
Gas-fitting apprentices may want to rethink their occupation in NZ with taxcindy banning gas production here according the NZ gas-fitting board.
Restaurants and Stir fry food on electric stoves going to result in stewed meat, veggies, slow orders. Induction elements wont work on round stir fry pans.
Million of household gas stoves and billions invested in infrastructure becomes redundant. Cost of household energy goes up for the already stretched budget. When it becomes the reality taxcindy isn't going to be so poplular.
 
Last edited:
Finally my few worthless shares in a wind farm went up. I would like to thank Taxcindies green rhetoric for ending this decade long lul in its shorted value..maybe she could spend a few of her facebook posts and twitter tweets instead on Reddit.

Beside being neatly strategically placed ontop of one of NZ's most windiest ranges it failed to perform to its expected prospectus. Apparenly all it really needed was blow hard paris accord taxcindy to move the share price. Ahhh the thought of subsidies.
 
Last edited:
In an unexpected turn of events, France accused itself of failing to meet climate change goals that were set in the accord signed in and named after its own capital city.
An administrative tribunal in Paris found France guilty of failing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as mandated by the 2015 Paris Agreement. The court declared that the French government is guilty of inaction on the treaty and is therefore responsible for ecological damage.'
The French government later issued a statement saying that it's taken note of the court's ruling and will introduce a new climate bill to the parliament next month that should help speed France's compliance with the terms of the accord.

www.france24.com

Paris court finds French state guilty in landmark lawsuit over climate inaction

A Paris court on Wednesday found the French state guilty of failing to meet its commitments to curb greenhouse gas emissions in a landmark ruling hailed by activists as a "historic victory for climate".
www.france24.com www.france24.com
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The windmills freeze in the cold
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top