Politics The future of European defence | strategy & industry |

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I have seen this debated multiple times. 80% yes right now given the will to do so. 100% with effort.

Europe could take a leap forward in logistics. It isn't a shiny new fighter jet, but they need it.
 
Denmark buys APC's and Mistrals.
The armed forces purchase 130 armored personnel carriers with funds from the Acceleration Fund
The Acceleration Fund is increasing the speed of the reconstruction of the Armed Forces. This is now concretely shown by the fact that Denmark buys 130 armored personnel carriers from the Finnish manufacturer Patria for DKK 1.9 billion. As part of the acquisition, the defense will have a small number of armored personnel carriers delivered already this year.

turbo has been put on the reconstruction of the Armed Forces with the government's acceleration fund. This underlines the purchase of 130 armored personnel carriers from the Finnish manufacturer Patria, which will strengthen the combat power in the Armed Forces.

Already this year, Denmark can have a small number of armored personnel carriers delivered from Patria, which can be used for training and education, so that the soldiers can quickly get to know the material. In this way, the Armed Forces are ready to use the personnel carriers when they are expected to be delivered in larger numbers from 2026 onwards.

”This is an example of well-functioning Nordic cooperation in the field of defence. The 130 armored personnel carriers strengthen the Armed Forces' combat power, and with the possibility of having a number of vehicles delivered already this year, the Armed Forces can use the equipment more quickly and get to know it. It is absolutely crucial in the current security policy situation”, says Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen.

The armored personnel carriers must be used both for building up the combat power in the light infantry battalion and for the heavy brigade. The wagons must be used by both infantry and engineering units, such as command station, communications, ambulances and for electronic warfare.

The 130 personnel carriers cost a total of approx. DKK 1.9 trillion, which is financed via the Acceleration Fund.

”With the purchase of armored personnel carriers from Patria, we strictly the Army broadly with a contribution to both the light infantry battalion and the heavy brigade, so that Denmark's defense is modernized and the soldiers have updated equipment. At the same time, it is important to strengthen the European defense industry – and that Denmark supports the industry by buying European. We do that with this purchase”, says Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen.

The armored personnel carriers have been developed in a joint program between Sweden, Germany, Latvia and Finland, and they are produced in Finland. They are supplied in several different variants.


Denmark buys several hundred French Mistral missiles
Newly purchased French Mistral missiles will be used for the Danish army's future short-range air defense.

Denmark has signed a procurement agreement for the acquisition of French Mistral missiles, which will be used for the army's future short-range anti-aircraft defences.

This has happened in connection with the Danish royal couple's three-day state visit to France, in which Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen (V) also participates.

How much money is spent from the Danish side on the French missiles and how many are purchased, the Ministry of Defense will not disclose.

The ministry simply states that these are "several hundred missiles". Troels Lund Poulsen emphasizes that the agreement is "another important step in building the Danish air defence".

- The agreement not only emphasizes our good cooperation with France, it also strengthens Danish fighting power and security. Close cooperation with France is absolutely necessary at a time of war in Europe and a security policy situation that is continuously developing, says the minister in a press release.

A joint purchase
It was expected that Denmark will purchase French missiles. Back in December, the media Olfi wrote that Denmark was one of nine EU countries that had joined forces for joint defense procurement.

The French Ministry of Defence's procurement agency wrote this on its website, according to Olfi. Specifically, it was said that the countries had come together to purchase a total of 1,500 French-produced Mistral 3 missiles.

Mistral missiles can attack combat aircraft operating at low altitudes, as well as helicopters and drones.

The new short-range air defense has not yet been built, but will be part of the army's 1. Brigade. The air force must protect the brigade against threats from the air.

In a defense agreement from 2024, it was stated that Denmark must purchase a long-range and two short-range air defense systems.

Denmark must have both a temporary and a permanent air defence.

 
Just watched a press conference by Finnish goverment:

Defense spending to be increased to minimum 3% of gdp by -29.

Finland will exit from the ottawa land mine ban.
 
Maybe this is the correct thread to discuss this further.
As @Hiryu2.0 posted on russia-ukraine-war thread.

Germany will deploy 45th Panzer Brigade into lithuania. Fully operational by 2027



  • Staff and Support Company Panzer Brigade 45 (Stabs- und Unterstützungskompanie Panzerbrigade 45; currently forming)
  • Panzergrenadier Battalion 122 (Panzergrenadierbataillon 122), in Oberviechtach with 44x Puma Infantry fighting vehicles — will move to Lithuania in 2026
  • Panzer Battalion 203 (Panzerbataillon 203), in Augustdorf with 44x Leopard 2A7 main battle tanks — will move to Lithuania in 2025
  • Multinational Battle Group Lithuania, in Rukla (will join Panzer Brigade 45 in 2026)
  • Panzer Artillery Battalion 455 (Panzerartilleriebataillon 455; will form in Germany and move to Lithuania before 2027)
  • Supply Battalion 456 (Versorgungsbataillon 456; will form in Germany and move to Lithuania before 2027)
  • Reconnaissance Company 45 (Aufklärungskompanie 45; will form in Germany and move to Lithuania before 2027)
  • Panzer Engineer Company 45 (Panzerpionierkompanie 45; will form in Germany and move to Lithuania before 2027)
  • Signal Company Panzer Brigade 45 (Fernmeldekompanie Panzerbrigade 45; currently forming)
*from wikipedia of 45th panzer brigade

The inclusion of the multinational battle group is interesting. As per my understanding that unit is a hodgepodge of different units and capabilities crammed into one battalion.

The present enhanced Forward Presence Battlegroup/Multinational Battlegroup Lithuania will be restructured and integrated into the brigade as a third combat battalion.

In addition, a German brigade – 37 Armoured Infantry Brigade since January 2025 – has been available in Germany. In the event of a crisis, this brigade will be deployed to Lithuania.
Canada plans to deploy two battalions of a brigade to Latvia by 2025. The United Kingdom will, in addition to its participation to the eFPenhanced Forward Presence Battlegroup in Estonia, earmark a brigade for rapid deployment to the Baltic region.
 
The main ground combat system looks promising. Imagine if all Euro nations were partners for it instead of just Germany and France and with other vehicles utilizing the same chassis system. You'd simplify logistics and every nation would get a piece of the manufacturing or have the same facilities and tooling should one partnered nation come up short. Instead of having Leopards, Leclerc's, Abrams, and Challengers to manufacture and support with different parts and systems while keeping ammo the same, you'd have just one. Keep it simple.
 
The main ground combat system looks promising. Imagine if all Euro nations were partners for it instead of just Germany and France and with other vehicles utilizing the same chassis system

True. But if Germany and France actually stick to it, it would be huge improvement from the last attempt with Kampfpanzer III / Napoleon I.
 
Whatever will develop from the Franco-German MGCS project, it will have a hard time to compete with the sexiness of this beast

1743536042078.webp
 
Norwegian foreign minister still lives in 2010's where "signaling" and "stigma" is more important than reality (Russia not in treaty, so mines would be used) and needs of national defense.

OSLO, April 2 (Reuters) - NATO member Norway will not withdraw from the global convention banning anti-personnel landmines as all the other European countries bordering Russia have done, the country's foreign minister said on Wednesday.

Finland on Tuesday said it planned to quit the 1997 Ottawa Convention as a way to mitigate the military threat posed by its neighbour Russia, following Poland and the Baltic countries, which announced similar moves last month.

That left Norway as the only European country bordering Russia that does not plan for the possibility to stock anti-personnel landmines again, but that is not about to change, Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide told Reuters.

It was important to keep a global stigma against a weapon that maims and kills long after a war is over, he said, and to ensure certain types of weapons, including chemical and bacteriological ones, remained ruled out for use in conflict.

"This particular decision (by Finland) is something that we regret," Barth Eide said in an interview.

"If we start weakening our commitment, it makes it easier for warring factions around the world to use these weapons again, because it reduces the stigma."

Norway was not concerned that its defence would be weakened by not changing its policy on anti-personnel landmines, he said. The Nordic country shares a 200km (124 miles) long border with Russia in the far north Arctic region.
"We have a very modern advanced defence system. We have purchased extremely advanced systems that can attack from land, the air and sea," Eide said.


 
From the excellent Mark Felton.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I have seen this debated multiple times. 80% yes right now given the will to do so. 100% with effort.

Europe could take a leap forward in logistics. It isn't a shiny new fighter jet, but they need it.

I don't think that logistics are the main problem per se but the different hardware used is what makes logistics complicated.

Rushing troops to the eastern EU border in an emergency will be no problem.

I see a bigger problem in not enough force enablers like ISR and ballistic missiles.

Germany buying 5 Puls launchers is a joke...
 
Germany buying 5 Puls launchers is a joke...
These five are only an initial order to replace the five M270s donated to Ukraine. Israel can deliver a limited amount of systems within an expedited time frame unlike the US which would take years for the first batch. Germany is getting their first systems this year where as for reference if we had gone for Himars instead of PULS the first delivery was expected to be in 2029-30. The first four PULS systems were delivered last year, less than mine months after placing the order. Germany is piggy-backing on an option for additional systems within the Dutch contract.

As I've written in the Western Europe thread before the Netherlands wouldn't be buying it if Germany wasn't planning on buying it also and German officials were part of the Dutch delegation.

Being forced to use American chassis, being restricted to US missiles unless an expensive nation specific modification was made and/or reliance on US political mood swings for access to ammunition and spares makes Himars, M270 and GMARS highly unappealing for Germany who wants to reduce reliance on US imports.

Buying off-the-shelf and combined purchases has already been happening more often and with rearmament speeding up this'll only increase in scope.

 
We need something like this as backup when EU is being stalled and as they intend to leave the UK out of these EU projects.

UK joined European officials at secret dinner to plot radical rearmament fund
A supranational bank would sidestep the European Commission, involve the British, and allow defense-spending off the balance sheet.

The off-the-books gathering brought together senior finance ministry officials from Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Poland, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom to float the idea of creating a supranational bank specifically for the purpose of jointly buying weapons and slashing the cost of defense procurement, according to officials familiar with the matter.

 
The less self reliance of the US to be your logistics main supplier the better. Good, good, about dang time.
 
Talking about logistics. Anyone wondered where the road with SALIS may take us? Given that a current more or most likely theatre of war in Europe would probably not need that sort of airlift capability and the withdrawal from Afghanistan reduced that need, do you think Europe/EU maybe NATO as a whole will invest in some sort of replacement/redundancy for Ukrainian An-124s? I heard that Airbus is kinda onto it somehow but haven't heard of it since..
 
Talking about logistics. Anyone wondered where the road with SALIS may take us? Given that a current more or most likely theatre of war in Europe would probably not need that sort of airlift capability and the withdrawal from Afghanistan reduced that need, do you think Europe/EU maybe NATO as a whole will invest in some sort of replacement/redundancy for Ukrainian An-124s? I heard that Airbus is kinda onto it somehow but haven't heard of it since..

This is precisely what the SATOC project (Strategic Air Transport for Outsized Cargo) launched in 2021 with the fourth round of PESCO funds (with Germany as coordinator and Czech Republic, France and the Netherlands as partners) and its most recent industrial derivative, the ESOCA project (European System for Outsized Cargo Airlift) launched in 2023 (Leaded by Airbus with ITP, GMV, SAFRAN, Leonardo and others as partners) and financed almost entirely by the European Defence Fund should be completed by the end of this year or early next year.

The objective of ESOCA is to carry out the necessary evaluations and studies to devise an adequate future replacement for the current European dependence on Antonov 124 and well before the C-17 reach the end of its service date...

They have to define the eventual European replacement (made-in Airbus of course) above the current capabilities of the A400M, going for a new design around or above 100tm of payload.
 
Rheinmetall has bought Hagedorn-NC, a producer of chemical components for lacquer. The company will switch to producing cellulose nitrate for ammunition production. Right now such components are sourced from China which has limited volume as a lot of it is going to russia, creating a bottleneck.

 
Latvia to buy 42 ASCOD-2 IFV... More work for GDELS-SBS.



Also, Spain has selected Quantum to replace the aging Raven RQ-11B and the discontinued WASP AE. In addition, Skydio X10 will be procured for company/sub-tactical units to reinforce their ISR capabilities.

The Quantum Twister purchased in undisclosed quantities will replace the Wasp AE in service with Air Force special operations units...

In the other hand the Quantum Vector AI (R24) will replace the Raven. The first adquisition phase involves 91 systems (182 UAVs) for the Spanish Army and Navy. Another Vector AI system from a separate prucurement will go to the Spanish Civil Guard. The military procurement programme foresees up to 150 Vector AI systems.

The Skydio X10s procured will be atleast 114 systems (456 UAVs) that will be delivered to Army, Navy and Air Force units.

 
These five are only an initial order to replace the five M270s donated to Ukraine. Israel can deliver a limited amount of systems within an expedited time frame unlike the US which would take years for the first batch. Germany is getting their first systems this year where as for reference if we had gone for Himars instead of PULS the first delivery was expected to be in 2029-30. The first four PULS systems were delivered last year, less than mine months after placing the order. Germany is piggy-backing on an option for additional systems within the Dutch contract.

As I've written in the Western Europe thread before the Netherlands wouldn't be buying it if Germany wasn't planning on buying it also and German officials were part of the Dutch delegation.

Being forced to use American chassis, being restricted to US missiles unless an expensive nation specific modification was made and/or reliance on US political mood swings for access to ammunition and spares makes Himars, M270 and GMARS highly unappealing for Germany who wants to reduce reliance on US imports.

Buying off-the-shelf and combined purchases has already been happening more often and with rearmament speeding up this'll only increase in scope.

Additionally KNDS Deutschland is building it under license production as EuroPULS, which is a no-go for most American systems. If it's already being built in Germany you can bet Germany will be one of the primary users.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top