Absolutely.Ok so... insider note... that's not how you hang yourself.
It also shows the level of self inflicted hysteria these activists are in.
I remember removing the security/protection off spectrum games - and then C64's - then Amiga's and 1040ST'sRemember the time when you would be on the internet downloading some 10mb game and your mom would yell "get out of the net, I am trying to call!"
And three weeks later we would have a family meeting "We have decided to drop the internet. *name of my brother* has visited adult entertainment site that required long distance call, cost us 1000 finnish marks."
We only got back to the internet few years later after long time of begging, when DSL plans with monthly payments came out.
thats when you want a really really warm day
is there that many trying to protect their grantsAbsolutely.
Yesterday, some 11,000 scientists (I'd be surprised to hear the number comprised more than a few hundred reputable scientists) published a declaration in which they predict "unspeakable human suffering". The problem being, their very own models – albeit predicting major climatic changes – do not support that claim.
All these hyteria-driven fear-mongerers out there completely ignore two facts: Climate change won't bring about new weather phenomenons, it will only aggravate those that already exist. Secondly, we do possess the technology to shield us from these phenomenons. For heaven's sake, medieval Europeans have built dikes that lasted for 500 years despite ever-rising sea levels. It's pathetically ill-informed to claim we're defenceless.
Absolutely.
Yesterday, some 11,000 scientists (I'd be surprised to hear the number comprised more than a few hundred reputable scientists) published a declaration in which they predict "unspeakable human suffering". The problem being, their very own models – albeit predicting major climatic changes – do not support that claim.
All these hyteria-driven fear-mongerers out there completely ignore two facts: Climate change won't bring about new weather phenomenons, it will only aggravate those that already exist. Secondly, we do possess the technology to shield us from these phenomenons. For heaven's sake, medieval Europeans have built dikes that lasted for 500 years despite ever-rising sea levels. It's pathetically ill-informed to claim we're defenceless.
Sad thing is the more protection there was on something the more interesting it was
the only thing we had a real issue with was a Steinberg music program which had a dongle and every time you did anything with the programme like save etc. the bloody code looked for the keyed dongle - there was also other code built in that looked for the dongle key code
Unfortunately a lot of fake names discovered on those petitions. Marsha Mellows, Claude Balls, Seymour Butts. Not saying there aren't a bunch of legit names, but it does seem sort of funny.Absolutely.
Yesterday, some 11,000 scientists (I'd be surprised to hear the number comprised more than a few hundred reputable scientists) published a declaration in which they predict "unspeakable human suffering". The problem being, their very own models – albeit predicting major climatic changes – do not support that claim.
All these hyteria-driven fear-mongerers out there completely ignore two facts: Climate change won't bring about new weather phenomenons, it will only aggravate those that already exist. Secondly, we do possess the technology to shield us from these phenomenons. For heaven's sake, medieval Europeans have built dikes that lasted for 500 years despite ever-rising sea levels. It's pathetically ill-informed to claim we're defenceless.
110% of the scientists cannot be 110% right all the timeUnfortunately a lot of fake names discovered on those petitions. Marsha Mellows, Claude Balls, Seymour Butts. Not saying there aren't a bunch of legit names, but it does seem sort of funny.
Scientists’ petition on climate crisis blocked over fake signatories
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sc...s/news-story/eb7b2647890516320363863b8dd1caee
thats quality - I bet they could not do that again if they tried 100 times - and yes I would try 100 times ? ? ? ?
Having been involved with a company that sank due to solar farm builds in aussie, it sounds like there are major issues in aussie with actual connection to the grid. We were lead to believe that farms were complete and ready to go but were not being connected due to government redtape, which of course meant the project was not complete and we were getting stung with non payment and completion penalties.Aussie is planning solar farms. Something of a 180 since they never mentioned any of that in election promises. Quite the opposite, in fact they were down right huggy for coal.
Perhaps they will be both.
But these new power generators plan on continual expansion and actively promote the demise of all else. Won't be until they consumer can't afford the air conditioner going, when they will suspect they were wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.