Scheißegal
Armenian leader N.Pashinian's twiitter message.
So what's the alternative? What country and what equipment should they depend on?That is what you get if you're overdependent on Russia. The Armenians failed to modernize their army, relying on outdated (Russian) military concepts and technology.
So what's the alternative? What country and what equipment should they depend on?
You seem to forget there are not any powerful and friendly countries nearby, while an alternative equipment costs a sh1tload of $.
Would relying on outdated (NATO) military concepts and technology change something?That is what you get if you're overdependent on Russia. The Armenians failed to modernize their army, relying on outdated (Russian) military concepts and technology.
There's no comparison to Israel, which receives billions in direct military aid for decades. There's only one Israel, and there's only one USA, failures of other countries is not that they aren't Israel. Some of that tech Israel has developed was used by the opposing side so that's Israel / US role here.There is no alternative. Ideally, Armenia would have been a self-reliant power on par with Israel, both driven by a national trauma (genocide), a strong communal drive for independence and a resourceful diaspora able to acquire international support and investment. But the Armenians, in contrast to the Israelis, were plagued by systemic corruption, an unfavourable geographic environment (landlocked) and the inability to modernize their society and army. That's a self-inflicted wound to some extent, considering the fact that the Armenians are a resourceful and intelligent people.
Their continued over-dependence on Russia will prevent them from making any meaningful political and economic reforms and much needed integration with the rest of Europe. They are really in a dire situation for the foreseeable future.
relying on outdated (Russian) military concepts and technology.
It is like say KSA failed in Yemen because relying on outdated (western) military concepts and technology. Ridiculous.
Your post doesn’t make any sense and it’s just an anti-Russian sh1t flinging.There is no alternative. Ideally, Armenia would have been a self-reliant power on par with Israel, both driven by a national trauma (genocide), a strong communal drive for independence and a resourceful diaspora able to acquire international support and investment. But the Armenians, in contrast to the Israelis, were plagued by systemic corruption, an unfavourable geographic environment (landlocked) and the inability to modernize their society and army. That's a self-inflicted wound to some extent, considering the fact that the Armenians are a resourceful and intelligent people.
Their continued over-dependence on Russia will prevent them from making any meaningful political and economic reforms and much needed integration with the rest of Europe. They are really in a dire situation for the foreseeable future.
No, it’s you who is comparing apples with oranges. That’s exactly what you have done, comparing Armenia with Israel.You're comparing apples with oranges.
The Saudis never managed to master the concepts and technologies transferred to them. The Armenians on the other hand are still relying on outdated Russian technology that is ill-suited for 21st century warfare, as they could have noticed if they would've paid attention to the conflicts in Syria, Libya and even in the Persian Gulf.
Besides, I'm not making a case for western technology over here. Just stating the obvious fact that complacency and the unwillingness/inability to innovate has bitten Armenia in the ass.
Your post doesn’t make any sense and it’s just an anti-Russian sh1t flinging.
Comparing Israel with Armenia doesn’t make any sense. The former is FAR richer, much more populated, has the USA as a protector and, most importantly, has nukes.
The Jewish diaspora in all over the world, especially in the USA, is disproportionately influential comparing to its size.
Its influence extends into wealth, science, politics, banking, big companies, medicine, law and media.
You fight with what you can afford, so stop comparing these two countries.
Furthermore, I don’t really understand your inconsistency. You talk about the outdated Soviet/Russian equipment, while your favourite Iran is far below the standard Soviet technical level when it comes to military planes, tanks and ships.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.