Photos Armenia v Azerbaijan

Really?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Armenia, which is losing ground and retreating in Karabakh, is purposeful - and this is now absolutely obvious! - inflicts missile strikes on the cities of Azerbaijan in the expectation of a retaliatory Azerbaijani strike in order to act as a "victim" and seek help from Russia and the CSTO.

Interesting. I thought this war mongering dude would be the first to jump on Armenian supporters band wagon.
 
Interesting. I thought this war mongering dude would be the first to jump on Armenian supporters band wagon.

Quite enough Russians are pissed about Armenia's behavior towards Russia pre-war.
"War mongering dudes" in Russia as you describe them are just bellicose nationalists. Own country's interests come first (whatever their interpretation of said interests is), war comes second.
 
This vids bring me back the vibes from Tsinkvally bombardment and assault and how things ended up for Georgia in 2008.

1. Except in 2008 both sides used cluster munition, especialy Russia made extensive use of them, and their's actualy worked while Georgian cluster munition proved incredibly unreliable and deployed below minimum range for some reason, accidently mining areas south of, and effectively outside the conflict zone, making it hazardeous for both populations, but mostly Georgians. I kind of see a bad pattern there with Israeli weapons delivered to Georgia in the 2000s ... Georgia even admitted their use, though stressed they never targetet civilian areas and thus far there has also been little to no evidence for that, contrary to Russian delivery systems that were recovered inside towns and villages, which included Iskander ballistic missiles. Most known civilian casaulties caused by cluster munition, where on the Georgian side.
2. Azerbaijan isn't facing Russia. It's military is also not as tiny and underequipped as Georgia's. There's a lot of nuances and completly different background and settings to make a blunt comparison like that.
3. Not least because Georgia responded to separatist attacks and didn't simply attack because it felt like it and there was a nice sunny day to start a war.
 
Last edited:
Yeah sure

I honestly don't give the slightest modicum of a fuke what your personal beliefs and conflict party preferences are, but those are the facts as documented by the IIFFMCG despite them making Georgia responsible for further escalating it with a large scale military operation.
 
All of this is about mondern-day Blitzkriegs.
Politically motivated attempts to "quickly solve" an old problem, with a fast and victorious push through disputed territory.
That was Georgia's plan for South Ossetia during the transition of power from Putin to Medvedev in Russia.
That was Kiev's plan in Donbass.
This is Azeri-Turkish plan in Nagorno-Karabakh.

All 3 plans failed. Nobody ever starts a war nowadays unless he's convinced he can win it quickly and with minimal losses.
Those who are on the weaker side, are interested in dragging out a relatively peaceful stalemate.
 
All of this is about mondern-day Blitzkriegs.
Politically motivated attempts to "quickly solve" an old problem, with a fast and victorious push through disputed territory.
That was Georgia's plan for South Ossetia during the transition of power from Putin to Medvedev in Russia.
That was Kiev's plan in Donbass.
This is Azeri-Turkish plan in Nagorno-Karabakh.

All 3 plans failed. Nobody ever starts a war nowadays unless he's convinced he can win it quickly and with minimal losses.
Those who are on the weaker side, are interested in dragging out a relatively peaceful stalemate.

You should probably inform yourself about those conflicts and the parties involved, instead of rambling such incoherent hogwash.
 
Armenian frontlines.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Back
Top