Warfare HAMAS attack on Israel, October 2023

LOL ,this woman just grows crasier with time...i hope shes not there when Trumpo wins and if anything... send her to stay with hamas or hizbolla, she cant see first hand how "tolerant" they are

Someone should remind her she has no say over how things are done outside of her San Francisco constituency.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
1713980502044.png
 
Israel has always had an aircraft airborne carrying a nuke. They have to simply because they are surrounded by enemies and have no warning time to load and launch an aircraft. Same thing we do same thing Russia does and China. There was a great movie 30 years ago with that famous black actor who has made many a movie but I can't remember his name. The name of the movie that pertains to Israel having an aircraft all the time was "The Sum of All Fears". The basis of the movie was one of those planes accidentally crashed at low level and the bomb was recovered by desert dwellers and sold to some bad guys who took the bomb to the US and placed it in a football stadium in a cigarette machine. The bomb detonates and you can watch the movie from there. I'll see if I can find it and post it. So I doubt seriously Israel would first strike unless they had solid intelligence they would be struck first...... end of story, Israel is a rational country
“Israel has always had an aircraft airborne carrying a nuke. They have to simply because they are surrounded by enemies and have no warning time to load and launch an aircraft. Same thing we do same thing Russia does and China.”
I have to ask, where do you get your information on any of these four countries exercising such nuclear operations (i.e., continuous airborne nuke(s))?

RL
 
You’d think they have something better to do, with their studies and finals exams coming up this semester. However, many pro-whatever people have their politics tied up in their studies….. Their radical professors are probably grading them on their "protest projects".
I’d be curious to know what percent of these protestors are actually enrolled students.
 
Last edited:
“Israel has always had an aircraft airborne carrying a nuke. They have to simply because they are surrounded by enemies and have no warning time to load and launch an aircraft. Same thing we do same thing Russia does and China.”
I have to ask, where do you get your information on any of these four countries exercising such nuclear operations (i.e., continuous airborne nuke(s))?

RL
The US has had airborne Nuclear aircraft airborne since the inception of our Strategic Air Command. Sometimes having two types of aircraft in use due to the constantly updating and new aircraft program. Even today we continue to update the Nuclear Air arm and keep them flying 24\7. Those other countries also have the equivalent, if they don't then they are fools. Every delivery platform is never out of range. You call them operations and we call them Missions.. It takes a long time to get B-52s airborne, use them or lose them. Today we have the B-1 which was initially designed as the replacement Nuke carrier for the B-52, but with so much trouble in the world in a conventional war it has been re fitted to carry normal ordinance, it you can call smart bombs normal. It can do Nuclear or Conventional and again it is always airborne as well as the B-52s. I don't believe there is any law that says nations cannot fly nuclear aircraft loaded. You can bet all our ships are loaded with nuclear weapons even our cruise missiles have Nuclear versions aboard. Russia and China are doing the same, those backfire bombers flying over the northern most ice caps most definitely carry nuclear weapons. That is why they are always intercepted and escorted until they leave the area. Israel is the number one target of Iran so they take it very seriously. The information you ask about is common knowledge, there is no point in having nuclear weapons if you can't deliver them. We always have a command and control aircraft airborne as the central control for all nuclear airborne aircraft. There are fuel tankers airborne all the time to make sure those other assets are always prepared. We might have a squid for a President but thankfully he has less control as he thinks he has. We have much smarter people airborne
 
I’d be curious to know what percent of these protestors are actually enrolled students.
Exactly! How many are stupid, impressionable students and how many are paid, professional agitators deployed from location to location?
 
The US has had airborne Nuclear aircraft airborne since the inception of our Strategic Air Command. Sometimes having two types of aircraft in use due to the constantly updating and new aircraft program. Even today we continue to update the Nuclear Air arm and keep them flying 24\7. Those other countries also have the equivalent, if they don't then they are fools. Every delivery platform is never out of range. You call them operations and we call them Missions.. It takes a long time to get B-52s airborne, use them or lose them. Today we have the B-1 which was initially designed as the replacement Nuke carrier for the B-52, but with so much trouble in the world in a conventional war it has been re fitted to carry normal ordinance, it you can call smart bombs normal. It can do Nuclear or Conventional and again it is always airborne as well as the B-52s. I don't believe there is any law that says nations cannot fly nuclear aircraft loaded. You can bet all our ships are loaded with nuclear weapons even our cruise missiles have Nuclear versions aboard. Russia and China are doing the same, those backfire bombers flying over the northern most ice caps most definitely carry nuclear weapons. That is why they are always intercepted and escorted until they leave the area. Israel is the number one target of Iran so they take it very seriously. The information you ask about is common knowledge, there is no point in having nuclear weapons if you can't deliver them. We always have a command and control aircraft airborne as the central control for all nuclear airborne aircraft. There are fuel tankers airborne all the time to make sure those other assets are always prepared. We might have a squid for a President but thankfully he has less control as he thinks he has. We have much smarter people airborne


I truly enjoy every narrative you share. I'd certainly extend an invitation for a beer—non-alcoholic for me, of course! :)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top