Warfare HAMAS attack on Israel, October 2023

The US has had airborne Nuclear aircraft airborne since the inception of our Strategic Air Command. Sometimes having two types of aircraft in use due to the constantly updating and new aircraft program. Even today we continue to update the Nuclear Air arm and keep them flying 24\7. Those other countries also have the equivalent, if they don't then they are fools. Every delivery platform is never out of range. You call them operations and we call them Missions.. It takes a long time to get B-52s airborne, use them or lose them. Today we have the B-1 which was initially designed as the replacement Nuke carrier for the B-52, but with so much trouble in the world in a conventional war it has been re fitted to carry normal ordinance, it you can call smart bombs normal. It can do Nuclear or Conventional and again it is always airborne as well as the B-52s. I don't believe there is any law that says nations cannot fly nuclear aircraft loaded. You can bet all our ships are loaded with nuclear weapons even our cruise missiles have Nuclear versions aboard. Russia and China are doing the same, those backfire bombers flying over the northern most ice caps most definitely carry nuclear weapons. That is why they are always intercepted and escorted until they leave the area. Israel is the number one target of Iran so they take it very seriously. The information you ask about is common knowledge, there is no point in having nuclear weapons if you can't deliver them. We always have a command and control aircraft airborne as the central control for all nuclear airborne aircraft. There are fuel tankers airborne all the time to make sure those other assets are always prepared. We might have a squid for a President but thankfully he has less control as he thinks he has. We have much smarter people airborne

“Israel has always had an aircraft airborne carrying a nuke. They have to simply because they are surrounded by enemies and have no warning time to load and launch an aircraft. Same thing we do same thing Russia does and China.”
I have to ask, where do you get your information on any of these four countries exercising such nuclear operations (i.e., continuous airborne nuke(s))?

RL

I'm nearly 100% certain that the US at least stopped 24/7 nuclear armed flights back in the early 70s.

Not aware of other nations stances but having beeing involved in QRA/QRF scenarios of RS5/10 I'd be amazed if anyone does that these days.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Ben Gvir's car was involved in traffic accidents and overturned - the minister is being evacuated from the area.
 

The amount of cope from the Pallybots about this is off the charts, she literally read out the ruling at the time as ICJ president but apparently they're right and she's wrong or she's been paid off by Israel or A, B, C or X Y Z, you know how it goes...
 
I'm nearly 100% certain that the US at least stopped 24/7 nuclear armed flights back in the early 70s.

Not aware of other nations stances but having beeing involved in QRA/QRF scenarios of RS5/10 I'd be amazed if anyone does that these days.
You could be right about that. I still believe there are flights airborne, especially today with the war in Europe. I cannot imagine not having some part of our air nuclear resources airborne. If you look at this 3 year old list of our nuclear force airborne you will not see the B-1 listed, for what ever reason I don't know but to not have our defense airborne would be suicide by denial. The other 2 year old mission says nothing about the B-52 being unarmed, but all the international escorts during that mission were armed to the teeth. With the squid in our white house today anything could be true and I'm sure he would be busy having an ice cream cone while the world is destroyed. The Nukes are not offensive or defensive, they are simply a deterrent..... unless a person happens to be a maniac. There are quite a few manias popping up today, also mentioned in an article was that North Korea does have a Nuke, they are still working on a way to deliver by sea and air. Lastly, I believe this 2 year old flight was indeed an armed B-52, on having engine problems the mission was made short and they returned to home. I think a statement was being made, especially since it was so publicized.


 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The IDF releases footage showing the moment when an Israeli drone targeted "Musab Khalaf," a leader within the "Lebanese Islamic Terrorist Group"

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You could be right about that. I still believe there are flights airborne, especially today with the war in Europe. I cannot imagine not having some part of our air nuclear resources airborne. If you look at this 3 year old list of our nuclear force airborne you will not see the B-1 listed, for what ever reason I don't know but to not have our defense airborne would be suicide by denial. The other 2 year old mission says nothing about the B-52 being unarmed, but all the international escorts during that mission were armed to the teeth. With the squid in our white house today anything could be true and I'm sure he would be busy having an ice cream cone while the world is destroyed. The Nukes are not offensive or defensive, they are simply a deterrent..... unless a person happens to be a maniac. There are quite a few manias popping up today, also mentioned in an article was that North Korea does have a Nuke, they are still working on a way to deliver by sea and air. Lastly, I believe this 2 year old flight was indeed an armed B-52, on having engine problems the mission was made short and they returned to home. I think a statement was being made, especially since it was so publicized.



B1s haven't been nuclear capable since the mid 90s.

The need for 24/7 airborne NWs went out ages ago and the US stopped in the early 70s, it makes no economic nor strategic sence with immediate launce ICBM fields and SSBNs.

You are right the BTF flights send a message - "we can do what we want where we want", but that doesn't mean it was armed with a NW. The reason it returned to Fairford was because that was where all the forward deployed infra and ground crew were.
 
video emerged of him saying "Zionists don't deserve to live".
He also said: "Be grateful that I'm not just going out and murdering Zionists."
"I don't fight to injure or for there to be a winner or a loser, I fight to kill," he said in a post.
Imagine saying the same thing about black people and then trying to explain it with "Oh, I misspoke in the heat of the moment".
 
B1s haven't been nuclear capable since the mid 90s.

The need for 24/7 airborne NWs went out ages ago and the US stopped in the early 70s, it makes no economic nor strategic sence with immediate launce ICBM fields and SSBNs.

You are right the BTF flights send a message - "we can do what we want where we want", but that doesn't mean it was armed with a NW. The reason it returned to Fairford was because that was where all the forward deployed infra and ground crew were.
The can is still being kicked around with these ICBM sites, either needed updates again or a new land based system that is in development but not deployed as yet. In 5 years ICBM missiles are due for major maintenance again and as usual we have a do nothing government that is more than happy to spend billions on other nations rather than take care of their responsibilities. I have a feeling the air fleet will be busy again, at least until the new ground system is finished, which is a major change in all the equipment in each silo. It will take a while to change ICBMs. In the treaties that were recently exited by Russia I would hope they dropped the show me clause which highly restricted our B-52 flights and even called for a visual marker on our fleet to recognize the role of the aircraft. Talk about giving our enemy a heads up who was the idiot that signed onto that one. The next 5 years will be interesting to see what path they take this time. I hope I'm still around to see what happens, I most certainly don't trust my enemies
 



Imagine saying the same thing about black people and then trying to explain it with "Oh, I misspoke in the heat of the moment".

A white person saying "something that could vaguely be understood as a very nebulous and unlikely allusion to a merely trivial criticism" towards a person belonging to one of the "protected classes" would not even been given the opportunity to explain himself and backtrack on what was said.

The mere "feeling" what was said "could be" (even so slightly) construed as racist is enough.
 
Aircraft of the Air Force attacked yesterday a launch site from which launches were carried out during the war towards the city of Ashdod.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
According to the IDF 606 Israeli service members have been killed in action since Oct. 6 while the number of destroyed terrorists is 14,000+ (claimed by IDF) on a total of 34,000 deaths (claimed by Hamas).
 
Last edited:
GMM1nT2XQAAKSfi.jpg
 
This is one case I absolutely hope they stand by their word. In fact, I very much hope all the pro-Pali "protesters" will make similar pledge. And if we are already at this, let's make it serious - let them swear on Das Kapital, whilst kissing the rainbow flag. So there would be no backsies.
 


I'm still baffled by how this is accepted. It's like saying, "and I mean no disrespect to my African brothers," but if someone in college, at work, or on the street openly uses the N-word, all hell will be break loose. How is it permissible to verbally, emotionally, and physically assault an entire demographic, religion, nation, or country with all kinds of insults, especially in academic settings? The only company with the courage to stand up to these ignorant low lives was Google.
 
What I find hilarious is "have the Israelis go back to their real home", then go on to list Europe and the US.

Ok, so while a case can be made regarding Europe being "the real home of the Israelis", from a Historical point of view, the US though?
Where is it supposed to put Native Indians?
Do the Israelis supersede these Indian tribes?
Are the Indian tribes actually of Israeli ancestry?
Are the Israelis the rightful owners of America?

:D

Love it when these uni morons think they managed to pull out some smart and clever slogan, but only manage to prove how retarded they really are.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top