@bfc1001
And yet the birthrate amongst immigrants drops quite rapidly once they've become economically integrated. The birth rate of Turkish-Germans (arguably the least badly-integrated of all badly-integrated immigrant communities in these parts) is less than half of what it used to be when the first guest workers came to this country.
I trust you're aware I'm not particularly fond of mass immigration, to say the least. Yet still observations such as Mohammed being the most popular boy's name in the United Kingdom in 2019 do not worry me nearly as much as the left's reaction to this observation. Their nonreflective approval to signal open-mindedness and their destructive belief that diversity is a good thing in and of itself are far more scary to me. They're at the root of all our woes, not boys named Mohammed.
If our governments demanded just half the effort from immigrants which their own governments demand from those moving to their countries, the world would be a better place. Heck, if just one prime minister had the guts to remind immigrants coming from what Trump calls "shithole countries" how badly we'd be treated if we wished to migrate there, it would probably make a difference.
You are correct about birthrate. However the paradigm is that 2nd and 3d generations are not migrants anymore
The equation is simple : the economy/industry needs low wages low education workforce. (2d and 3d generations (most of them) are not considered low education anymore.)
That's why you had since the 70s calls from various enterprises unions for open borders
It has been done recently in your country again (in particular during the 2015 immigration crisis)
Funnily back in the 70s the far left was against this process. Our own Communist Party leader (G. Marchais) had foreseen and understood the system.
Importation of low wages workforce was also a way to keep the wages low for the "natives" by the competition system
Since then the far left has done a full U turn on the issue.
So you have a convergence between Industry tycoons and far left ideologsts for more migration. Ones will say it's a way to keep the pension scheme of our respective countries and the others will speak about "think about the children"
In both cases, they do not take in consideration that :
- low wages low education workforce is less needed nowadays because of increase in the technicity of most jobs
- mass migration applies a burden on the social security (healthcare, pensions, unemployement) of our respective countries
- not even talking about the public safety issues
Alas, on the "right" it is also a way to blow out the public system (see Chomsky explanation : how to destroy a public system ; put it in a situation where it cannot work anymore .... which is exactly what is happening with the kind of immigration we have right now). Once destroyed, it is easier to privatize the thing
On the left, it is now a significant voter pool
Both are winning from that
The ones losing are us ....