No offence, but I too think your "new world order" take is off. George Soros is but a bitter old man who believes that what he's been through gives him the moral high ground to meddle in other country's affairs. Well, guess what, I was stabbed once – it doesn't make me an expert on emergency surgery, though. Anyway, I'm not quite sure what makes you call Soros an ally of Beijing. And I would absolutely advocate my own little variation of Hanlon's razor for his case: Never attribute to a conspiracy where mundane personal motives (like a craving for recognition) suffice.
This woke "fifth column" that's been poisoning political discourse in the West (and given birth to an equally bitter caste of nutjobs on the opposite end of the spectrum) is actually not following anybody's orders nor anyone's hidden agenda. They're trapped within the constraints of their ideology, which becomes quite apparent whenever their conflicting interests clash (for instance, the vast majority of feminists tolerate the complete undoing of feminist core values by the trans-movement; if they spoke out they'd have to see themselves as "oppressors").
At any rate, China is anything but promoting globalism in my opinion. As a matter of fact (and it pains me to admit this), those who question whether the CCP's hold on the country even classifies as a communist dictatorship anymore aren't entirely wrong. The regime has made somewhat of a shift to the right (in conventional political terms). It now imposes on its subjects concepts not typically associated with communism, like racial purety and chasteness. Xi Jingping has certainly been borrowing from Stalinism, the most fascist form of communism.
