Politics Climate Hysteria Debunked Yet Again ....

Why can't the city focus on fixing the things it can fix, ie roading, sanitation, building code, rather than play government trying to fix things that cannot be fixed because it ain't broke?

NYC does this, and what about the next city? Does everyone get to sue them "dirty polluters" to what end? And how is that 75b$ to be used? If it were to be paid?

It's complete nonsense, but you cannot see that when your head is so far up your arse you're eating small intestine. OK, rant done, coffee time. Love you
 
Wasn't sure which thread to place this.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Wasn't sure which thread to place this.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Actually if they want to play solar games then let that be on flat public land where no man who wants an adventurous life would ever go. The greenies love to see good farmland getting covered in panels..then wonder why their grocery bill is high, tantamount to LA wondering why their houses burnt after voting to not have water supplied.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
New York follows California...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Which raises rates, people getting broke even more because of it and blames corporate greed but continues to vote for the ones fining these companies.

Meanwhile NY found a new way to redistribute wealth from a grift.
 
Fonterra has used social media to reassure customers it is not using a feed additive designed to lower cows’ climate impact.

But a trade expert says food exporters have little choice but to reduce the planet-heating impacts of their products, if they want access to the most lucrative global markets.

The dairy giant was caught up in misinformation around the use of Bovaer, a supplement that shrinks the planet-heating gases burped by dairy cows by about a third.

The product is not used in New Zealand, because trials showed it was not very effective in animals mainly grazing on pasture.
Just before Christmas, BBC’s Inside Science podcast reported on a social media backlash to well-known brands of milk, butter and cheese sold at major United Kingdom supermarkets, produced using milk from lower-methane cows.

The trend featured people pouring milk down the drain and vowing not to buy it again.

Food scientists explained the product had been tested as safe and was not present in milk or meat from animals that ate the supplement, but posts on platforms such as TikTok received millions of views.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
1/2 trillion for just for powerlines, for the US that is 7 trillion.
NZ pine forests are now foreign owned carbon credit scams.
60% carbon emmisions by Russia, China, India, usa aren't even in Paris.
 
Back
Top