• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you

Movie / TV Do you like "Fury"?

Ivan1987

Mi Corporal
MI.Net Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
65
Points
64
I'm kind of curious to hear your opinion. I like the movie. I think it's the only time when the filmmakers came close to the quality of "Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers" with a feature film set on European battlefield and following members of the U.S. Army. Otherwise, we only got shitty movies like "Pathfinders: In the Company of Strangers" or "Saints and Soldiers" and it's various spin-offs.

I didn't even mind Brad Pitt in the main role, although I can't stand the man nowadays.
 
BS movie
Some scenes are decent but that's pretty all
The whole story (a single Sherman immobile versus 200 Waffen SS) is an Hollywood hype ala Rambo style
Don't even compare it with Saving Private Ryan (that was decent all long except in the end)
 
The only thing that was good about Fury were the cinematics. Indeed it felt like one of those hilarious 1950's war movies visually and dramaturgically repackaged to appeal to a post-Saving Private Ryan audience. The casting wasn't very good either. Brad Pitt is just not a serious actor.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I didn't even mind Brad Pitt in the main role, although I can't stand the man nowadays.

I'm sorry, but he's overrated. He might be a good cast in dandy roles, but…

Everyone and their dog's been praising him ever since 'Seven'. Granted, I've never found my wife's severed head in a box, so what the flipping feck do I know, but the way he yammered "Nooo Nooo Nooo" in that movie sounded so wooden and awkward it made me burst out in laughter.
 
It was entertaining, but mediocre.

I enjoyed the whistling of the rounds though.
 
I'm sorry, but he's overrated. He might be a good cast in dandy roles, but…

Everyone and their dog's been praising him ever since 'Seven'. Granted, I've never found my wife's severed head in a box, so what the flipping feck do I know, but the way he yammered "Nooo Nooo Nooo" in that movie sounded so wooden and awkward it made me burst out in laughter.

He's maybe not Daniel Day-Lewis caliber, but he's still a pretty good actor. He did a pretty awesome job in 12 Monkeys and Fight Club, for example. IMHO.
 
The final fight, well, what do you know, a lot of similar incidents happened during WW2. Look at how Audie Murphy stopped the Germans with just one machine gun in Alsace. And at this stage of the war, the Germans probably weren't too determined to fight against the Americans. Hence the huge casualties in the movie.
 
He's maybe not Daniel Day-Lewis caliber, but he's still a pretty good actor. He did a pretty awesome job in 12 Monkeys and Fight Club, for example. IMHO.

Love both those movies. He’s a good actor. You’re right. Some people said he « overacted » in both 12 Monkeys and Fight Club, I’m biased because I love these movies maybe.

Disclaimer: I haven’t seen Fury but I’m fine with debating Brad actor’s skills.

Muck: Se7en was good especially the twisted story; his acting is debating...
 
The final fight, well, what do you know, a lot of similar incidents happened during WW2. Look at how Audie Murphy stopped the Germans with just one machine gun in Alsace. And at this stage of the war, the Germans probably weren't too determined to fight against the Americans. Hence the huge casualties in the movie.
Nothing comparable
I can see a man go berzerk and kill 6 men, especially with a MG
I don't see a lone tank not able to move sustain the action of a full Waffen SS bataillon
And for the Germans not eager to fight, you should re-read some tank commanders memoires about the Hitlerjungen or the Waffen SS in Germany
Plus, i don't want to be that guy, but they said the attacking party had 2 Panzerfaust (in a crate), one missing, one killing a crew member
Just few minutes before that scene, you see at least 2 if not 4 SS with Panzerfausts on the shoulder.
And in any case, an immobile tank is a dead tank. It's easy to come in the dead angles (rear for example).

No, this movie has 0 realism when you look at the ending part.
 
Here's Audie Murphy's full citation:

"2d Lt. Murphy commanded Company B, which was attacked by 6 tanks and waves of infantry. 2d Lt. Murphy ordered his men to withdraw to prepared positions in a woods, while he remained forward at his command post and continued to give fire directions to the artillery by telephone. Behind him, to his right, 1 of our tank destroyers received a direct hit and began to burn. Its crew withdrew to the woods. 2d Lt. Murphy continued to direct artillery fire which killed large numbers of the advancing enemy infantry. With the enemy tanks abreast of his position, 2d Lt. Murphy climbed on the burning tank destroyer, which was in danger of blowing up at any moment, and employed its .50 caliber machinegun against the enemy. He was alone and exposed to German fire from 3 sides, but his deadly fire killed dozens of Germans and caused their infantry attack to waver. The enemy tanks, losing infantry support, began to fall back. For an hour the Germans tried every available weapon to eliminate 2d Lt. Murphy, but he continued to hold his position and wiped out a squad which was trying to creep up unnoticed on his right flank. Germans reached as close as 10 yards, only to be mowed down by his fire. He received a leg wound, but ignored it and continued the single-handed fight until his ammunition was exhausted. He then made his way to his company, refused medical attention, and organized the company in a counterattack which forced the Germans to withdraw. His directing of artillery fire wiped out many of the enemy; he killed or wounded about 50. 2d Lt. Murphy's indomitable courage and his refusal to give an inch of ground saved his company from possible encirclement and destruction, and enabled it to hold the woods which had been the enemy's objective."

I think there are clear similarities to what we saw at the end of the movie. Even might have been based on this event.
 
He's maybe not Daniel Day-Lewis caliber, but he's still a pretty good actor. He did a pretty awesome job in 12 Monkeys and Fight Club, for example. IMHO.

Despite having no interest or knowledge of baseball, I really enjoyed 'Moneyball' to the point of seeing it maybe three or four times. I think the main reason is probably Pitt's performance.
 
Here's Audie Murphy's full citation:

Yeah, but why does Murphy stand out? Because it was a rare feat of courage, and because his opponents fought with cunning and courage as well, and had not been doomed to die by a well-meaning screenwriter sending them to attack one by one.

Hollywood war movies create the impression that in war every single engagement ends with a heroic last stand of a few unwilling heroes against hordes of hostile zombies. The issue being, if your aim is to create a realistic movie, you ought to stick to the most realistic scenario.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I was listening to this podcast a few days ago. This is one part that made me think. There are movies more realistic than others, but a realistic movie is boring and there are none.

I liked Fury as a movie, the atmosphere and sound(the whizz of the rounds, as said above) are very good.
 
I'm sorry, but he's overrated. He might be a good cast in dandy roles, but…

Everyone and their dog's been praising him ever since 'Seven'. Granted, I've never found my wife's severed head in a box, so what the flipping feck do I know, but the way he yammered "Nooo Nooo Nooo" in that movie sounded so wooden and awkward it made me burst out in laughter.

Pitt is pretty good at playing dim-witted, non-intellectual characters—going half-retard—like in Burn After Reading or Snatch. I really liked him in Kalifornia.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Despite having no interest or knowledge of baseball, I really enjoyed 'Moneyball' to the point of seeing it maybe three or four times. I think the main reason is probably Pitt's performance.

That movie was terrible and captured the reality of baseball as well as Fury portrayed WWII armored warfare.
 
That scene was 110% unrealistic. The field was freshly ploughed and tilled. Every tankers nightmare, “shed-your-tracks-a-gogo”.....

But very entertaining. When was the last time you saw a real Tiger in motion? I read the fresh dirt was purposely added as a way to protect the Tiger from damage during filming.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Back
Top