I've been watching the Polish video mentioned above for 1.5 hours and it was great.
The points are:
i. if NATO had not assisted Ukraine with intel and ammo, the Ukrainians would have been fvcked up by now.
ii. There are trains of ammo being delivered from Poland on a daily basis in a low-key way and some ex-WP countries assist with that as well. 122mm and 152mm shells are not accessible in any old NATO armies. It is the major thing that STILL keeps the Ukrainian Army going, as they would have run out of ammo by now.
iii. NATO shares intel with the Ukrainians, mostly in the North and Russian weak points are pin pointed. The Ukrainians know where RU air defence is inactive and use their drones and helicopters JUST there.
iv. Notice the bombardment of RU troops in Bucha where 2 mechanised companies were totally fvcked up. First that column was shelled by rocket and heavy artillery, then Mi-24s destroyed it totally. The point is clear, the Ukrainians knew where that column was, but also knew that there was not any RU air defence present there. They got this info from NATO, of course.
v. Following the previous point, the Russians don't give a sh1t about air defence despite Russian mechanised companies having embedded AA systems like the Tunguska and the Tor plus MANPADS. Nothing like that was present in Bucha and Ukrainians knew about it after the intel sharing by NATO. That's why they deployed attack helicopters.
vi. Putin ALWAYS sits VERY FAR from his generals at a table. He's afraid of being killed by his own officers/generals. That's plainly logical. Everybody can notice how far away he sits from his staff.
vii. Russian soldiers in the North and North-East have a very low morale. They are very young conscripts who don't want to die for Putin. They often abandon tanks or drive/fool around in order to waste fuel in order to surrender or deliberately drive to the mud. Nothing like that happens in the South/Donbas where the Russians are more professional and organised. So is their air defence there, that's why the Ukrainians don't attack them with drones in that area.
viii. An armoured brigade deployed in Kherson holds its ground and it was able to push the Russians back across the Dneper. They tried to cross the dam, but were stopped by Russian artillery. They cannot blow up the dam, as laying explosives would take 1 week if they were not shelled.
ix. The Ukrainians either withdraw from Mariupol and Donbas in general or they will become surrounded. No option number 3.
x. The Ukrainian troops NE of Kyiv are to be surrounded soon and the Russians are committing reserves there.
xi. If the Belarusians commit 4 brigades that are on the border, Ukraine is basically fvcked. They may seal off the Polish border, pushing to the south, and making ammo deliveries for the Ukrainians impossible. The EU can try to negotiate with Luka and give him some cookies, but it's very unlikely he will agree for that.
xii. New Ukrainian recruits will not be able to use the NATO-supplied weapons efficiently, as doing it requires a lot of training. MANPADS and Javelins are not spears.
xiii. The Russian troops are about to cut off the major highway from Kyiv to the Polish border.
xiv. Poland has already donated 6 MiG-29s to Ukraine and we will receive some alternative (better!) planes in return. Everything is financed by the EU. We are going to replace the MiGs with alternative fighters that way.
xv. Macron is pissed off at Putin, as the latter gave him a lot of sh1t. That's why he decided to deploy Rafales with subsonic missiles to the Eastern NATO flank.
xvi. The situation for Ukraine is pretty grim. The guy says, judging how well/bad some Russian troops perform based on their location, the attack on Donbass (from Crimea and SW Russia) was planned a long time ago. The attack on N and NE Ukraine is purely accidental, chaotic and unorganised. The Russians got a bloody nose, but are committing reserves and replace conscripts with contractors and pros. Also, they move troops from Kharkiv area to Kyiv.