• We are implementing a new rule regarding the posting of social media links and Youtube videos, the rule is simple if you are posting these links please say something about it rather than just dropping what we call a "drive by Link", a comment on your thoughts about the content must be included. Thank you

Politics All Things Trump

As lowering the global oil prices is a problem for Putin, when the prices drop below production costs, won't that same problem apply to US oil companies at some point? If Venezuelan oil starts to get pumped efficiently and in huge quantities, it will surely affect global price, no?

I hear some oil company representatives are already pissed off with Trump.
Buying USA oil isn’t a risk/crime. Russia has to discount it, so India can make a profit, plus all these tankers cost money. So low price hits Russia first.

But yes if Venezuelan oil pumps more, price will drop. Maybe Saudi lowers production, to stabilise things.
 
How other presidents do it:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I love that story! Reagan was awesome. The first person I was old enough to vote for.
 
Lol RINO Graham wants more money to spend on the US military. The $3,8b which Israel receives each year to keep US manufacturing going is spent smartly on a lean and lethal fighting machine to further US interests where as the same amount added to the US DoD budget would be just another disasterously failed attempt at designing a ship, light tank or toilet seat that everyone just shrugs at.

Smart move on Israel's part to get rid of the leash.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
This is how it will go after sovreignty is handed over.
Lawyers in Greenland are going to be uber rich with all the indigenous land claims that will come forth.
There is rear earth in them thar hills.
Let the bids begin.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
On the ICE shooting: It's always the same with these incidents, people spend lots of time analysing the video footage declaring "it's obvious that X thing happened, you can clearly see it if you have eyes!", but watching that new footage from the agent's phone, it's over in literally two seconds, he doesn't have a bullet time ability to be able to slow the event down so he can see that "the wheels are totally facing away from him don't you know", he's reacting in real time, living the moment as it's happening. The couple were clearly being confrontational and if she'd just stopped and complied, she'd be alive.

That said, once the vehicle had started to pass, were the secondary shots into the driver's window really necessary? Did they anticipate her being an active threat if she drove away? Did the agent perhaps panic after being almost ran into by a vehicle for a second time in recent memory? Seems like a tragedy that could've been easily avoided by various factors...
 
An extraordinary fact

Zero percent
of Greenland is privately owned, as all land belongs to the public and is managed by the Greenlandic government; instead of buying land, individuals and businesses acquire exclusive land use rights via government permits called area allotments for specific purposes, reflecting Greenland's socialist ideals and communal resource management

Yes but the UNers decided that this is a post whiteman concept. And in fact the land was used by the indigenous whom have used it for generations for hunting and have maintained that unbroken use therefor have claim to that land.
See Australia
Native Title: Following the Mabo decision (which overturned terra nullius), the Native Title Act 1993 enabled claims for land where Indigenous rights hadn't been extinguished, recognizing ongoing connection to Country, with millions of hectares under title by 2020.
So when one family who have used that area find a big deposit the socialist use ends very quickly.
Am not sure how they do sit-ins at -30c?
We know they like to be all up to date with the latest UN theories. The whole sovreignty idea is a UN one to start with.

Also on the basis of that Trump thinks he can get the entire shootin box.
Its the realestate casino man wet dream. He has a big centre fold of Greenland on the wall.
 
Last edited:
From the WH
1000055458.webp
 
There is a problem with the front wheels that video. They need to re-edit and add fleeing ICE.
If you move you will be shot as a new legal caution.
 
On the ICE shooting: It's always the same with these incidents, people spend lots of time analysing the video footage declaring "it's obvious that X thing happened, you can clearly see it if you have eyes!", but watching that new footage from the agent's phone, it's over in literally two seconds, he doesn't have a bullet time ability to be able to slow the event down so he can see that "the wheels are totally facing away from him don't you know", he's reacting in real time, living the moment as it's happening. The couple were clearly being confrontational and if she'd just stopped and complied, she'd be alive.

That said, once the vehicle had started to pass, were the secondary shots into the driver's window really necessary? Did they anticipate her being an active threat if she drove away? Did the agent perhaps panic after being almost ran into by a vehicle for a second time in recent memory? Seems like a tragedy that could've been easily avoided by various factors...
Yeah, having watched the first footage over and over and the new one too, all I can say, it's just a chain of events where several things lead to the tragedy. Both parties had their part in those events, neither party had premeditated intent to hurt the other, but that's just how it went.

Good possibly misjudged the turn radius of her car and the officer just saw the car coming straight at him.
 
The problem is by supporting and aiding without prejudice the admin is officially installing that is a normal practice.
Which may as well be in some third world shithole country. I cannot differentiate.
I have seen many traffic violations USA on youtube, approaching in that manner is also not one of them.
 
Also as ever, we only have footage of the shooting, we don't know anything about the events that lead up to this point beforehand except accounts by both sides of the aisle. Why was the vehicle even sideways on the road like that anyway? Seems like she wasn't "just observing" as has been claimed.
 
minute 1:07

You can see the car dropping off one person and then positioning the car as seen in the other reels.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Their approach says everything. Zero tolerance from the outset.
Is that something called intent?
Anyway as said good there is video these days, instead of the report cop ran over lucky to be alive.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top